Re: [ntp:questions] fudge time1 for gps-18x-LVC?

2010-02-06 Thread David J Taylor
"David Lord" wrote in message news:7t3ms3fqe...@mid.individual.net... [] Somehow I think I might be in sync with wrong edge of PPS. Why? That would put pps out, but I'd have guessed by only 100ms if that's default. Yes, David, according to the Technical Specifications the default is 1

Re: [ntp:questions] fudge time1 for gps-18x-LVC?

2010-02-06 Thread David Lord
David J Taylor wrote: "David Lord" wrote in message news:7t3ms3fqe...@mid.individual.net... [] Somehow I think I might be in sync with wrong edge of PPS. Why? That would put pps out, but I'd have guessed by only 100ms if that's default. Yes, David, according to the Technical Specifica

Re: [ntp:questions] fudge time1 for gps-18x-LVC?

2010-02-06 Thread David J Taylor
"David Lord" wrote in message news:7t53vhfb3...@mid.individual.net... [] A few us isn't bad from PPS unless I'm supposed to use the -350 ms from nmea via RxD. Note that the PPS via serial and parallel are both converging to same < 10us and it's only when serial DCD is disconnected that GPS_N

Re: [ntp:questions] fudge time1 for gps-18x-LVC?

2010-02-06 Thread David Lord
David J Taylor wrote: "David Lord" wrote in message news:7t53vhfb3...@mid.individual.net... [] A few us isn't bad from PPS unless I'm supposed to use the -350 ms from nmea via RxD. Note that the PPS via serial and parallel are both converging to same < 10us and it's only when serial DCD is

Re: [ntp:questions] fudge time1 for gps-18x-LVC?

2010-02-06 Thread David Woolley
David J Taylor wrote: OK, I mis-read the table. If the 9 microseconds is the true offset, What do you mean by true offset? That is not actually measurable ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions

Re: [ntp:questions] fudge time1 for gps-18x-LVC?

2010-02-06 Thread David J Taylor
"David Woolley" wrote in message news:hkjre8$7b...@news.eternal-september.org... David J Taylor wrote: OK, I mis-read the table. If the 9 microseconds is the true offset, What do you mean by true offset? That is not actually measurable As opposed to the figures of 350 microseconds, 350

Re: [ntp:questions] fudge time1 for gps-18x-LVC?

2010-02-06 Thread David J Taylor
"David Lord" wrote in message news:7t55hufjj...@mid.individual.net... David J Taylor wrote: "David Lord" wrote in message news:7t53vhfb3...@mid.individual.net... [] A few us isn't bad from PPS unless I'm supposed to use the -350 ms from nmea via RxD. Note that the PPS via serial and paral

Re: [ntp:questions] fudge time1 for gps-18x-LVC?

2010-02-06 Thread Rob
David J Taylor wrote: > > "David Woolley" wrote in message > news:hkjre8$7b...@news.eternal-september.org... >> David J Taylor wrote: >> >>> OK, I mis-read the table. If the 9 microseconds is the true offset, >> >> What do you mean by true offset? That is not actually measurable > > As oppose

Re: [ntp:questions] fudge time1 for gps-18x-LVC?

2010-02-06 Thread David Lord
David J Taylor wrote: "David Lord" wrote in message news:7t55hufjj...@mid.individual.net... David J Taylor wrote: "David Lord" wrote in message news:7t53vhfb3...@mid.individual.net... [] A few us isn't bad from PPS unless I'm supposed to use the -350 ms from nmea via RxD. Note that the P

Re: [ntp:questions] fudge time1 for gps-18x-LVC?

2010-02-06 Thread unruh
On 2010-02-06, David J Taylor wrote: > > "David Lord" wrote in message > news:7t3ms3fqe...@mid.individual.net... > [] Somehow I think I might be in sync with wrong edge of PPS. >>> >>> Why? >>> >> >> That would put pps out, but I'd have guessed by only 100ms >> if that's default. > > Yes,

Re: [ntp:questions] fudge time1 for gps-18x-LVC?

2010-02-06 Thread David J Taylor
"David Lord" wrote in message news:7t5papf3b...@mid.individual.net... David J Taylor wrote: [] You're confusing me even more here! Is a summary: 1 - PPS connected to DCD (serial) - low offset 2 - PPS connected to DCD (serial) and NACK (parallel) - low offset 3 - GPS to serial, PPS to par

Re: [ntp:questions] fudge time1 for gps-18x-LVC?

2010-02-06 Thread unruh
On 2010-02-06, David J Taylor wrote: > > "David Lord" wrote in message > news:7t5papf3b...@mid.individual.net... >> David J Taylor wrote: > [] >>> You're confusing me even more here! Is a summary: >>> >>> 1 - PPS connected to DCD (serial) - low offset >>> >>> 2 - PPS connected to DCD (serial)

Re: [ntp:questions] fudge time1 for gps-18x-LVC?

2010-02-06 Thread David J Taylor
"unruh" wrote in message news:slrnhmrgjr.e6q.un...@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca... [] He said that he had left the GPS18 in its default mode, where much more than a single sentence is sent out ( about 4 of them if I remember correctly). He shold probably set it so just the single required sentence i

Re: [ntp:questions] fudge time1 for gps-18x-LVC?

2010-02-06 Thread David Lord
David J Taylor wrote: "unruh" wrote in message news:slrnhmrgjr.e6q.un...@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca... [] He said that he had left the GPS18 in its default mode, where much more than a single sentence is sent out ( about 4 of them if I remember correctly). He shold probably set it so just the sin

Re: [ntp:questions] fudge time1 for gps-18x-LVC?

2010-02-06 Thread David Lord
David Lord wrote: .. Next experiment is to try type 22 atom driver without type 20 nmea driver and have the three ntp servers for giving the correct second. I'll try with parallel pps first since I was unable to get this to work on desktop downstairs and it is already wired up for that. T

Re: [ntp:questions] Client doesn't drop failed source

2010-02-06 Thread Danny Mayer
David Woolley wrote: > E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists wrote: > >> >> I can perhaps see idling the connection to keep it open when the >> poll rate is at ~ 1 minute, however what about when the poll >> rate decreases to ~ 17 minutes? (or less often if so configured) >