Re: [ntp:questions] Help with Resolution SMT

2010-05-12 Thread Hal Murray
In article <4beb53a2.4050...@signaturealpha.com>, Marc Leclerc writes: >Hi, > >Seems the generic parser does't work with NTP with resolution SMT. Has >anyone modified some source to make it work?. NTP reports answer as bad >Data, but trimble studio hooked directly to the chip reports good data.

Re: [ntp:questions] Is this normal?

2010-05-12 Thread Hal Murray
In article , "Russell, David" writes: > The device is a piece of networking equipment and so I doubt that the crystal > is temperature controlled but since it is in a data center the temperature > and power demand is steady. > If you could see the graph you would see that it seems to oscillate

Re: [ntp:questions] XFAC (?)

2010-05-12 Thread Laurent Archambault
Hi all, Many thanks for all answers, and i have an another possibility for XFAC : Extra Fast Attack Crafts Your solution seen better ! best regards 2010/5/12 Dave Hart > On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 20:18 UTC, Uwe Klein wrote: > > > > so XFAC stands for > > X Inter > > F Face > > A Association > >

[ntp:questions] Help with Resolution SMT

2010-05-12 Thread Marc Leclerc
Hi, Seems the generic parser does't work with NTP with resolution SMT. Has anyone modified some source to make it work?. NTP reports answer as bad Data, but trimble studio hooked directly to the chip reports good data. ___ questions mailing list que

Re: [ntp:questions] local vs Windows Server 2003

2010-05-12 Thread David Woolley
Adrian Marsh wrote: The main windows server is set to clock from time.nist.gov, and I'm fighting to get the linux clients to sync from my internal server. Windows clients seem ok (I know thats done via AD). w32time needs a lot of tweaking to make it NTP compliant. I'm not sure if all the t

Re: [ntp:questions] XFAC (?)

2010-05-12 Thread Dave Hart
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 20:18 UTC, Uwe Klein wrote: > > so XFAC stands for > X Inter > F Face > A Association > c Change > ?? I really don't know what was imagined initially. Perhaps eXchange interFACe? With four capital letters used for these locally-generated pseudo-refids, there's not a lot o

Re: [ntp:questions] XFAC (?)

2010-05-12 Thread Uwe Klein
Dave Hart wrote: On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 04:20 UTC, Laurent Archambault wrote: After many search, i has not find my answer, whay do it mean the status "XFAC" (?). ntpd resets associations when the local network interface (or, really, IP address) being used for that peer goes away. This mean

Re: [ntp:questions] local vs Windows Server 2003

2010-05-12 Thread Steve Kostecke
On 2010-05-12, Chuck Swiger wrote: > > On May 12, 2010, at 9:48 AM, Adrian Marsh wrote: >> server ntp.ubiquisys.local >> restrict ntp.ubiquisys.local mask 255.255.255.255 nomodify notrap noquery > > If you restrict the timesource you are trying to use with nomodify, I > don't believe ntpd will le

Re: [ntp:questions] local vs Windows Server 2003

2010-05-12 Thread Steve Kostecke
On 2010-05-12, Adrian Marsh wrote: > It seems to be preferring LOCAL over a clock source. The Undisciplined Local Clock (127.127.1.n), aka "LOCAL", should only be used on ntpds which must be able to serve time to others even when its real time sources are not reachable. The Undisciplined Local

Re: [ntp:questions] XFAC (?)

2010-05-12 Thread Dave Hart
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 04:20 UTC, Laurent Archambault wrote: > After many search, i has not find my answer, whay do it mean the status > "XFAC" (?). ntpd resets associations when the local network interface (or, really, IP address) being used for that peer goes away. This means the clock filter

Re: [ntp:questions] local vs Windows Server 2003

2010-05-12 Thread Chuck Swiger
Hi-- On May 12, 2010, at 9:48 AM, Adrian Marsh wrote: > However today, the main server needed a reboot, and since then I can't get > any of the linux clients to agree to sync to the main server (no * against > the peers listing). [ ... ] > The config is: > > server 127.127.1.0 > fudge 127.127

[ntp:questions] local vs Windows Server 2003

2010-05-12 Thread Adrian Marsh
Hi, I have an Active Directory environment supporting several Windows and Linux based PCs. The main windows server is set to clock from time.nist.gov, and I'm fighting to get the linux clients to sync from my internal server. Windows clients seem ok (I know thats done via AD). This was all

Re: [ntp:questions] Local time sources

2010-05-12 Thread Jaap Winius
On Tue, 11 May 2010 15:10:50 +, unruh wrote: > ... note that chrony also now (1.24 version) allows use of gpsd to > synchronize your clock with the Garmin ( and also does not have the > problem you mention with ntpd that if it freeruns too long, it may not > resynchronize-- it will and do so f

Re: [ntp:questions] XFAC (?)

2010-05-12 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On 2010-05-12, Uwe Klein wrote: >> "Laurent Archambault" wrote in message > >>> After many search, i has not find my answer, whay do it mean the status >>> "XFAC" (?). > > grep -A1 -B2 XFAC $(find . -type f) > > ntp_peer.c- if (peer->dstadr != piface && !(peer->cast_flags & > ntp_p

Re: [ntp:questions] XFAC (?)

2010-05-12 Thread Uwe Klein
David J Taylor wrote: "Laurent Archambault" wrote in message After many search, i has not find my answer, whay do it mean the status "XFAC" (?). Is this in relation to NTP? One use I found was the string ".XFAC." used as reference clock source ID (I think). Looks like, why else would

Re: [ntp:questions] Local time sources

2010-05-12 Thread David J Taylor
"Jaap Winius" wrote in message news:4bea0ef6$0$30780$e4fe5...@dreader20.news.xs4all.nl... On Tue, 11 May 2010 09:46:17 +0100, David J Taylor wrote: I do like your Web page, and added a pointer to it from mine... Interesting page! I've added it to my page's "Further reading" section. Thanks

Re: [ntp:questions] XFAC (?)

2010-05-12 Thread David J Taylor
"Laurent Archambault" wrote in message news:x2w692f4d2f1005112120nb08f2f41m93b97084bdf25...@mail.gmail.com... Hello all, After many search, i has not find my answer, whay do it mean the status "XFAC" (?). I has find this "Extra Fast Attack Crafts", and i am very happy for this...but in french