Re: [ntp:questions] Maximum time2 fudge value for NMEA refclock?

2010-07-25 Thread Terje Mathisen
jimmyterrence wrote: On Jul 22, 10:40 am, jimmyterrence wrote: On Jul 22, 9:11 am, Rhys wrote: In article, sn...@lordynet.org says... Rhys wrote: In article, sn...@lordynet.org says... Rhys wrote: In article, david- tay...@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid says... "Rhys" wrote in message

Re: [ntp:questions] Maximum time2 fudge value for NMEA refclock?

2010-07-25 Thread David J Taylor
"Terje Mathisen" <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> wrote in message news:5dbth7-6k8@ntp.tmsw.no... [] 55401 183.702 127.127.20.0 $GPGGA,000303,5955.1025,N,01038.4599,E,2,06,2.0,33.1,M,39.8,M,,*77 Yes, that is the location of the metal bracket on the east end of my roof. :-) Terje 59.91837

Re: [ntp:questions] Is a packet with stratum 1 allowed to contain a KoD code?

2010-07-25 Thread David L. Mills
Danny, KoD packets have the leap bits set to 3 (unsynchronized); the stratum is not signficant. The reference implementation sets the stratum to 16 for the RATE kiss code. However, packet stratum 16 is mapped to stratum 0 as visible to the monitoring function. Codes like INIT and STEP are use

Re: [ntp:questions] Maximum time2 fudge value for NMEA refclock?

2010-07-25 Thread Terje Mathisen
David J Taylor wrote: "Terje Mathisen" <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> wrote in message news:5dbth7-6k8@ntp.tmsw.no... [] 55401 183.702 127.127.20.0 $GPGGA,000303,5955.1025,N,01038.4599,E,2,06,2.0,33.1,M,39.8,M,,*77 Yes, that is the location of the metal bracket on the east end of my roof. :-

Re: [ntp:questions] Is a packet with stratum 1 allowed to contain a KoD code?

2010-07-25 Thread Danny Mayer
Dave, That was the point I was trying to make. I wasn't making any statements about the reference implementation though since he didn't he didn't tell us what the server was running and he was asking a general question. Danny On 7/25/2010 1:42 PM, David L. Mills wrote: > Danny, > > > KoD packe