Miroslav,
I ran the same test here on four different machines with the expected
results. These included Solaris on both SPARC and Intel machines, as
well as two FreeBSD machines. I tested with and without the kernel, with
initial offset 300 ms (including step correction) and 100 ms. I tested
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 01:29:14PM +, David L. Mills wrote:
> This doesn't make any sense. Your data show the frequency set to 0.0
> and the a series of clock steps after that. If this is with your
> simulator, try it with the real machine. I have tested with three
> machines herewith and witho
Miroslav,
The extra complexity is not worth the benefit.
Dave
Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 02:49:57PM +, David L. Mills wrote:
There is a very good reason. First, the kernel can an only be
switched between PLL and FLL mode discreetly, while the daemon has a
gradual
Miroslav,
This doesn't make any sense. Your data show the frequency set to 0.0 and
the a series of clock steps after that. If this is with your simulator,
try it with the real machine. I have tested with three machines herewith
and without kernel and with no such problems.
Dave
Miroslav Lic
