On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 05:14 UTC, David L. Mills wrote:
> Thanks for the test. I verified the same thing. Note that the measured
> offset at the end of the frequency measurement phase was very small, so the
> net frequency measurement should be the same as Solaris. Obviously, FreeBSD
> is doing so
I regret to report ntpd 4.2.7p79, with the freq_mode fix, is still
unable to estimate the frequency on the FreeBSD 6.4 test machine. I
repeated yesterday's tests after updating ntpd, still using the daemon
loop and four sources with iburst and maxpoll 6.
55507 47027.172 0.000131624 80.505 0.00029
On 2010-11-05, David L. Mills wrote:
> Bo;;.
>
> At the time the clock is read and the adjustment has not completed, the
> current offset is known, regardless of the residual offset not yet
> amortized. At this point there is no need to consider the residual
> offset, as a new offset has been d
