Good day,
Normally my team uses the "ntpstat" utility to check that systems are in
sync and so on. Usually we use the one provided by our OS vendor, but
in a particular case we require the latest stable ntpd build because of
a bugfix that affects some of our systems. The "old" build of ntpsta
On 2011-02-03, Schmidt, Bryan wrote:
> Can someone point me to the authoritative location for ntpstat source
> code? Search engines have not served me well in this regard, to much
> confusion with the "ntpstats" directory.
http://people.redhat.com/rkeech/#ntpstat
I'm adding this to http://supp
On 2/2/2011 7:07 PM, Schmidt, Bryan wrote:
Good day,
Normally my team uses the "ntpstat" utility to check that systems are in
sync and so on. Usually we use the one provided by our OS vendor, but
in a particular case we require the latest stable ntpd build because of
a bugfix that affects som
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 05:07:19PM -0700, Schmidt, Bryan wrote:
> Normally my team uses the "ntpstat" utility to check that systems are in
> sync and so on. Usually we use the one provided by our OS vendor, but
> in a particular case we require the latest stable ntpd build because of
> a bugfix th
Thank you gentlemen. Patches and the new link on ntp.org are exactly
what I needed.
-Bryan
If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail message, please notify the
sender
and delete all copies immediately. The sender believes this message and any
attachments
were sent free of any virus
Schmidt, Bryan wrote:
Good day,
Normally my team uses the "ntpstat" utility to check that systems are in
sync and so on. Usually we use the one provided by our OS vendor, but
in a particular case we require the latest stable ntpd build because of
a bugfix that affects some of our systems.
On 2011-02-03, Schmidt, Bryan wrote:
> Thank you gentlemen. Patches and the new link on ntp.org are exactly
> what I needed.
>
> -Bryan
Could you please remover the following stuff from your postings on the
net? It is totally inappropriate ( or do you really waht the 500
people who do not wa
Not only is it inappropriate is it complete bull+++t. The short of
it is that contracts are only valid if both parties agree that they
are valid so you can't put one on the end of emails and expect it to
"stick". What if I were wrong?
OK just in case I'm wrong,,,
Be reading this email you agr
