On Mar 18, 12:57 am, David J Taylor david-
tay...@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid wrote:
Folks,
I have received the following announcement:
___
The MoD has informed Ofcom of the following GPS jamming exercise:
Dates: Jamming will be conducted on a
Bruce Lilly wrote:
4. Assuming specific sizes for an integer is a really bad idea...
(64 bits making up the) clockTimeStamp* and receiveTimeStamp* fields
Bruce, I tend to agree with your wish for totally separate drivers, but
it is a fact of live around here that it is far, far simpler to get
Which apparently allows ongoing, hands-off use of unsigned drivers
after initial setup. I am curious to hear from anyone who tries it
with serialpps.sys and ntpd on Windows.
Cheers,
Dave Hart
Folks,
This is now written up here - comments and corrections warmly invited:
Terje Mathisen terje.mathisen at tmsw.no wrote:
Bruce Lilly wrote:
4. Assuming specific sizes for an integer is a really bad idea...
(64 bits making up the) clockTimeStamp* and receiveTimeStamp* fields
Bruce, I tend to agree with your wish for totally separate drivers, but
it is a fact of
Coming thick and fast!
_
The MoD has informed Ofcom of the following GPS jamming exercise:
Dates: 19 - 26 May 2011.
Times: limited periods between 0700z 19 May to 100z 2 May 2011.
Location: The ground based radar jamming events will
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 09:16 UTC, Martin Burnicki
martin.burni...@meinberg.de wrote:
I'm not familiar with POSIX SHM details, but from the point of view from SHM
feeders (like gpsd) it would also be easier to say you can use this with
ntpd's driver 41 than to say you can use this with driver
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Martin Burnicki
martin.burni...@meinberg.de wrote:
David Woolley wrote:
Windows will probably retain the last correction, but this may include a
high frequency component.
AFAIK the Windows port of ntpd restores the standard tick value when it
terminates, so
Dave Hart daveh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 09:16 UTC, Martin Burnicki
martin.burni...@meinberg.de wrote:
I'm not familiar with POSIX SHM details, but from the point of view from SHM
feeders (like gpsd) it would also be easier to say you can use this with
ntpd's driver 41 than
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Rob wrote:
How is the ntp.conf file parsed and the driver initialized in ntpd?
Is the value of a fudge flag even available at the moment a driver
is initialized?
The entire file is parsed for syntax and translated into a machine
representation before any of it
On Mar 15, 1:51 am, Chris H n...@archnetnz.com wrote:
I hear in the Media that the earth quake sped the rotation of the earth
up..
Can anyone confirm this?
Take a look at the annual variation in Length of Day and Pole Position
in these plots
http://hpiers.obspm.fr/
Any effect from the
ntp# ntptime
ntp_gettime() returns code 5 (ERROR)
time d12e2683.b9944a60 Fri, Mar 18 2011 18:44:19.724, (.724919741),
maximum error 672 us, estimated error 5 us, TAI offset 0
ntp_adjtime() returns code 5 (ERROR)
modes 0x0 (),
offset -26.113 us, frequency 6.447 ppm, interval 1 s,
maximum
On 2011-03-18, Edward T. Mischanko etm1...@hotmail.com wrote:
ntp# ntptime
ntp_gettime() returns code 5 (ERROR)
time d12e2683.b9944a60 Fri, Mar 18 2011 18:44:19.724, (.724919741),
maximum error 672 us, estimated error 5 us, TAI offset 0
ntp_adjtime() returns code 5 (ERROR)
modes 0x0
12 matches
Mail list logo
