In my opinion, transmitting the time with an offset of about 680
seconds with "... some of the systems transmitted the wrong time
without this indication." (unhealthy indicator), is a bit
unprofessional. Of course, it is the users' sole responsibility to
configure his/her time servers in order to a
On the first page of the manual one may read: "The M9107 GPSDO
includes an extremely high-performance GPS receiver that can acquire
and track up to 50 GPS signals ..."
I'm just curios where you get signals from 50 satellites if the whole
constellation is about 30 ... with no more than a half visib
Eugen ,
The remote NIST servers do not use the ACTS driver in the distribution.
They use an algorithm called lockclock that functions as a modem device
driver. I assume the unhealthy indication provided in the ACTS timecode
is translated to the NTP LI indicator via the local clock driver, but
Eugen COCA wrote:
On the first page of the manual one may read: "The M9107 GPSDO
includes an extremely high-performance GPS receiver that can acquire
and track up to 50 GPS signals ..."
I'm just curios where you get signals from 50 satellites if the whole
constellation is about 30 ... with no mo
