Hi,
I'm doing some testing of the ntp config I made and don't really
understand what just happened.
Primarly I'm looking at two ntp servers and one clock out of a larger
setup.
NTP is quite critical so I've already done some head-scratching to
come to this setup.
Setup on ntp01:
server meinberg1
On Jul 8, 2011, at 7:38 AM, Florian Heigl wrote:
# local fallback clock
server 127.127.1.0
fudge 127.127.1.0 stratum 10
Don't do this, unless you absolutely need ntpd to freewheel in the absence of a
reference time from the GPS receiver or other NTP servers for an extended
period of time.
On 7/8/2011 10:38 AM, Florian Heigl wrote:
Hi,
I'm doing some testing of the ntp config I made and don't really
understand what just happened.
Primarly I'm looking at two ntp servers and one clock out of a larger
setup.
NTP is quite critical so I've already done some head-scratching to
come to
On Jul 8, 2011, at 10:27 AM, Florian Heigl wrote:
Don't do this, unless you absolutely need ntpd to freewheel in the absence
of a reference time from the GPS receiver or other NTP servers for an
extended period of time.
That's the case - if we lose all 4 reference clocks the NTP servers
I've noticed that when polling at lower intervals, and PLL is in use,
that the frequency tends to change as expected to steer the offset
towards zero. When polling intervals increase, and FLL is in use, the
frequency tends to follow the offset and not steer the offset towards
zero. Why does FLL
