Hi guys,
I don't know how i managed to get blacklisted on support.ntp.org but
this happened while attempting to submit my time servers to the
stratum two list.
I think i submited one of my servers without selecting proper stratum
and then tried to edit the post ... i think i did that a couple of
t
tickadj always tells me I am silly when I give it the -A described in
the docs for optimized tick. I looked at tickadj.c quickly and did
not see any facilities for -A
2011/9/25 Dave Hart :
> 2011/9/25 Dave Hart :
>> 2011/9/25 Miguel Gonçalves :
>>
>>> tick# tail -10 /var/log/ntp/loopstats
>>> 5
2011/9/25 Dave Hart :
> 2011/9/25 Miguel Gonçalves :
>
>> tick# tail -10 /var/log/ntp/loopstats
>> 55829 66814.311 0.10871 185.398 0.03540 0.002317 4
>> 55829 66831.312 0.10025 185.398 0.00984 0.002167 4
>> 55829 66847.312 0.11242 185.398 0.01303 0.002027 4
>> 55829 66862.31
2011/9/25 Miguel Gonçalves :
> I have a machine running FreeBSD 7.4 and it seems that the CPU clock runs
> too fast or slow (positive offset in loopstats is fast or slow?).
ntpd's offset and the frequency compensation are both reported as
corrections to the local clock to bring it into alignment w
Miguel Gonçalves wrote:
I have a machine running FreeBSD 7.4 and it seems that the CPU clock runs
too fast or slow (positive offset in loopstats is fast or slow?).
Neither. A constant sign on an offset is an indication that something
is broken, either the algorithm, or the static frquency er
Hi guys!
I have a machine running FreeBSD 7.4 and it seems that the CPU clock runs
too fast or slow (positive offset in loopstats is fast or slow?).
tick# tail -10 /var/log/ntp/loopstats
55829 66814.311 0.10871 185.398 0.03540 0.002317 4
55829 66831.312 0.10025 185.398 0.00984 0.0
