unruh,
unhurt,
1. You have a broken interpretation on how the NTP discipline algorithm
works. See the online document "How NTP Works," and in particular the
discipline and clock state machine pages.
2. Your compar
On 2011-11-08, David L. Mills wrote:
>unruh,
>
> unhurt,
?? Am I supposed to read something into this mispelling?
>
> 1. You have a broken interpretation on how the NTP discipline algorithm
> works. See the onli
When running recent versions of ntpd and with a recent Solaris patch, I see
large delay and jitter in ntpq based output, and in the stats files. I am
running in a high performance configuration where I'm trying to minimize offset.
I think it is a Solaris problem in asynchronous i/o processing, w
Hi--
On Nov 8, 2011, at 12:29 PM, Fran wrote:
> My ‘high performance’ configuration is running ntpd bound to processor 0 on
> an SMP, and at highest priority. My poll rate is 16 sec. And I’m running ntpq
> locally so ntpq is communicating with ntpd over the loopback interface. Most
> of these c
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 23:26, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> If you've set ntpd's priority above 100 via realtime scheduling class,
> then it has priority over the system kernel threads which service
> network interrupts. select() might be legitimately returning zero
> because ntpd is running before the N
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 23:27, Nathan Kitchen
wrote:
> I'm curious about some behavior that I'm observing on a host running
> ntpd as a client. As I understand it, configuring a local reference
> clock--either an undisciplined local clock or orphan mode--shouldn't
> help me, but I see different beh
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Dave Hart wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 23:27, Nathan Kitchen
> wrote:
> > I'm curious about some behavior that I'm observing on a host running
> > ntpd as a client. As I understand it, configuring a local reference
> > clock--either an undisciplined local cloc
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 03:12, Nathan Kitchen
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Dave Hart wrote:
>> I agree that I would not expect to see any difference in behavior
>> between LAN source only (#1) and LAN source + orphan mode (#2). I am
>> not surprised to see difference in behavior with
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 09:32, Dave Hart wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 04:07, Doug Calvert
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Why do the nmea and pps drivers differ regarding the default for flag2? How
>> would a user know which is appropriate?
>>
>>> PPS(22):
>>> flag2 0 | 1
>>> Specifies PPS capture
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Dave Hart wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 03:12, Nathan Kitchen
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Dave Hart wrote:
> >> I agree that I would not expect to see any difference in behavior
> >> between LAN source only (#1) and LAN source + orphan mode (#
10 matches
Mail list logo