Re: [ntp:questions] Leap second

2012-01-06 Thread Garrett Wollman
In article <4f07406b$0$16297$e4fe5...@dreader37.news.xs4all.nl>, Rob van der Putten wrote: >It would have to be implemented in a way that makes sense. A new >standard perhaps. Is anyone into this sort of thing? The Reference Implementation of the timezone library includes time2posix() and posi

Re: [ntp:questions] Very large jitter and offsets on GPS ref clock after upgrade to "p5"

2012-01-06 Thread E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
On 1/6/2012 3:18 PM, Mike S wrote: > On 1/6/2012 4:54 PM, E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the > BlackLists wrote: >> On 1/6/2012 12:28 PM, unruh wrote: >>> Eg, your encore pluse is a TTL level pulse (0-3 volt transition) >> >> I thought he indicated he had a Oncore UT+ ? >> >> The M1

Re: [ntp:questions] Leap second

2012-01-06 Thread unruh
On 2012-01-07, Harlan Stenn wrote: > Rob wrote: >> Does ntpd actually use files from the /usr/share/zoneinfo/right/ tree? > > NTP and the kernel use UTC (changing this is SAMOP). Well, not really. They use utc if the source uses utc. If I have a computer where the system time is TAI, and you use

Re: [ntp:questions] Leap second

2012-01-06 Thread Harlan Stenn
Rob wrote: > Does ntpd actually use files from the /usr/share/zoneinfo/right/ tree? NTP and the kernel use UTC (changing this is SAMOP). Anything under zoneinfo is localization. H ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/

Re: [ntp:questions] Very large jitter and offsets on GPS ref clock after upgrade to "p5"

2012-01-06 Thread Mike S
On 1/6/2012 4:54 PM, E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists wrote: On 1/6/2012 12:28 PM, unruh wrote: Eg, your encore pluse is a TTL level pulse (0-3 volt transition) I thought he indicated he had a Oncore UT+ ? The M12M Oncore specs TTL interface (0 to 3 V) The UT Pl

Re: [ntp:questions] Very large jitter and offsets on GPS ref clock after upgrade to "p5"

2012-01-06 Thread unruh
On 2012-01-06, E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists wrote: > On 1/6/2012 12:28 PM, unruh wrote: >> Eg, your encore pluse is a TTL level pulse (0-3 volt transition) > > I thought he indicated he had a Oncore UT+ ? > > The M12M Oncore specs TTL interface (0 to 3 V) > The UT

Re: [ntp:questions] Very large jitter and offsets on GPS ref clock after upgrade to "p5"

2012-01-06 Thread E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
On 1/6/2012 12:28 PM, unruh wrote: > Eg, your encore pluse is a TTL level pulse (0-3 volt transition) I thought he indicated he had a Oncore UT+ ? The M12M Oncore specs TTL interface (0 to 3 V) The UT Plus Oncore TTL specs TTL interface (0 to 5 V) The GT Plus Oncore specs TTL interface (0 to 5

Re: [ntp:questions] Fixed Point Arithmetic Updates

2012-01-06 Thread Dave Hart
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 18:40, Charles Elliott wrote: > How or where can I find the recent updates to the NTPD fixed-point > arithmetic?   I would like to compile them into the source I am using. The most recent changes went in last night, and should be released in the next few hours when the 4.2.

Re: [ntp:questions] Leap second

2012-01-06 Thread unruh
On 2012-01-06, Rob van der Putten wrote: > Hi there > > > unruh wrote: > >> Not sure what you are saying. "it does"-- what does? And what does >> 'right' mean here. > > 'right' is just a directory name. 'it does' means the file contains leap > second info; > > file /usr/share/zoneinfo/posix/Europ

Re: [ntp:questions] Leap second

2012-01-06 Thread Rob van der Putten
Hi there unruh wrote: Not sure what you are saying. "it does"-- what does? And what does 'right' mean here. 'right' is just a directory name. 'it does' means the file contains leap second info; file /usr/share/zoneinfo/posix/Europe/Amsterdam /usr/share/zoneinfo/posix/Europe/Amsterdam: tim

[ntp:questions] Fixed Point Arithmetic Updates

2012-01-06 Thread Charles Elliott
How or where can I find the recent updates to the NTPD fixed-point arithmetic? I would like to compile them into the source I am using. Charles Elliott ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions

Re: [ntp:questions] Very large jitter and offsets on GPS ref clock after upgrade to "p5"

2012-01-06 Thread Chris Albertson
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Chris Albertson wrote: > On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 1:32 AM, leap235960 wrote: >> Le vendredi 6 janvier 2012 04:44:36 UTC+1, Chris Albertson a écrit : >> >>> ntpq> peers >>>      remote           refid      st t when poll reach   delay   offset   >>> jitter >>> ===

Re: [ntp:questions] Leap second

2012-01-06 Thread unruh
On 2012-01-06, Rob van der Putten wrote: > Hi there > > > unruh wrote: > >> Do not work what way? > > What I meant was that it would be nice to run TAI instead of UTC. > >> It is announced now, it occurs Jun 30. >> The tzdata database contains a file called "leapseconds" which contains >> all of t

Re: [ntp:questions] Leap second

2012-01-06 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 12:41:13PM +0100, Rob van der Putten wrote: > >It is announced now, it occurs Jun 30. > >The tzdata database contains a file called "leapseconds" which contains > >all of the leapseconds which have occured or are know to occur in the > >future. > > In 'right' (based on th

Re: [ntp:questions] Leap second

2012-01-06 Thread Rob van der Putten
Hi there unruh wrote: Do not work what way? What I meant was that it would be nice to run TAI instead of UTC. It is announced now, it occurs Jun 30. The tzdata database contains a file called "leapseconds" which contains all of the leapseconds which have occured or are know to occur in th

Re: [ntp:questions] Very large jitter and offsets on GPS ref clock after upgrade to "p5"

2012-01-06 Thread leap235960
Le vendredi 6 janvier 2012 04:44:36 UTC+1, Chris Albertson a écrit : > ntpq> peers > remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter > == > oGPS_ONCORE(0) .GPS.0 l 14 16 35

Re: [ntp:questions] Very large jitter and offsets on GPS ref clockafter upgrade to "p5"

2012-01-06 Thread David J Taylor
"Chris Albertson" wrote in message news:CABbxVHsO6hqf7n=hf4uxd4jk6jw91bt3gor1dx7zxpvvs+r...@mail.gmail.com... I just upgraded to 4.2.6p5@1.2349-o and I'm getting some odd results. NTPD has been running for about 12 hours now on a Linux system. The following three "peers" displays were taken abo