"A C" wrote in message
news:4f4b221a.6020...@acarver.net...
[]
Sun sparc (Zilog serial ports), not Intel/AMD. FreeBSD has different
serial drivers for different architectures. The hardware I have is not
faulty. Under Solaris it all works (but I don't have a copy of Solaris
7 around to supp
On 2/26/2012 22:02, David J Taylor wrote:
"A C" wrote in message
news:4f4a8863.2010...@acarver.net...
[]
FreeBSD's serial drivers are also very broken (in fact, even more
broken than NetBSD because FreeBSD can't even see the DCD line).
This sounds like you have faulty hardware. There has been
"A C" wrote in message
news:4f4a8863.2010...@acarver.net...
[]
FreeBSD's serial drivers are also very broken (in fact, even more broken
than NetBSD because FreeBSD can't even see the DCD line).
This sounds like you have faulty hardware. There has been no problem with
FreeBSD drivers on the
"Richard B. Gilbert" wrote in message
news:s9-dnzgbns0_jtfsnz2dnuvz_uwdn...@giganews.com...
[]
If you really want good time and can afford a GPS *timing* receiver
that's the way to do it. The last I heard, you could get a timing
receiver for $100 -- $300.
Time for an update - as Bill says,
On 2012-02-27, Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
> On 2/26/2012 6:20 PM, unruh wrote:
>> On 2012-02-26, Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
>>> On 2/26/2012 12:55 AM, Ron Frazier (NTP) wrote:
On 2/25/2012 5:05 PM, A C wrote:
> On 2/25/2012 13:09, Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
>> On 2/25/2012 1:20 AM, A C
On 2/26/2012 6:20 PM, unruh wrote:
On 2012-02-26, Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
On 2/26/2012 12:55 AM, Ron Frazier (NTP) wrote:
On 2/25/2012 5:05 PM, A C wrote:
On 2/25/2012 13:09, Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
On 2/25/2012 1:20 AM, A C wrote:
On 2/24/2012 21:26, A C wrote:
Is it possible to chang
On 2/26/2012 6:20 PM, unruh wrote:
On 2012-02-26, Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
On 2/26/2012 12:55 AM, Ron Frazier (NTP) wrote:
On 2/25/2012 5:05 PM, A C wrote:
On 2/25/2012 13:09, Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
On 2/25/2012 1:20 AM, A C wrote:
On 2/24/2012 21:26, A C wrote:
Is it possible to chang
On 2012-02-26, A C wrote:
> On 2/26/2012 15:09, Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
>> On 2/26/2012 12:55 AM, Ron Frazier (NTP) wrote:
>>> On 2/25/2012 5:05 PM, A C wrote:
On 2/25/2012 13:09, Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
> On 2/25/2012 1:20 AM, A C wrote:
>> On 2/24/2012 21:26, A C wrote:
>>>
On 2012-02-26, Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
> On 2/26/2012 12:55 AM, Ron Frazier (NTP) wrote:
>> On 2/25/2012 5:05 PM, A C wrote:
>>> On 2/25/2012 13:09, Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
On 2/25/2012 1:20 AM, A C wrote:
> On 2/24/2012 21:26, A C wrote:
>> Is it possible to change the polling in
On 2/26/2012 15:09, Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
On 2/26/2012 12:55 AM, Ron Frazier (NTP) wrote:
On 2/25/2012 5:05 PM, A C wrote:
On 2/25/2012 13:09, Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
On 2/25/2012 1:20 AM, A C wrote:
On 2/24/2012 21:26, A C wrote:
Is it possible to change the polling interval of one or
On 2/26/2012 12:55 AM, Ron Frazier (NTP) wrote:
On 2/25/2012 5:05 PM, A C wrote:
On 2/25/2012 13:09, Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
On 2/25/2012 1:20 AM, A C wrote:
On 2/24/2012 21:26, A C wrote:
Is it possible to change the polling interval of one or more
associated
servers at runtime? It seems l
On 2/26/2012 2:30 PM, A C wrote:
On 2/26/2012 10:20, David J Taylor wrote:
"A C" wrote in message
news:4f4a6e79.3010...@acarver.net...
[]
It's the latest dev version on NetBSD using five network servers plus
the SHM refclock plus the ATOM refclock. The SHM is not very stable
with its offset so
On 2/26/2012 10:20, David J Taylor wrote:
"A C" wrote in message
news:4f4a6e79.3010...@acarver.net...
[]
It's the latest dev version on NetBSD using five network servers plus
the SHM refclock plus the ATOM refclock. The SHM is not very stable
with its offset so I don't use it right now which le
"A C" wrote in message
news:4f4a6e79.3010...@acarver.net...
[]
It's the latest dev version on NetBSD using five network servers plus
the SHM refclock plus the ATOM refclock. The SHM is not very stable
with its offset so I don't use it right now which leaves me ATOM plus
network (one of the n
On 2/25/2012 23:19, David J Taylor wrote:
"A C" wrote in message
news:4f49ca89.9090...@acarver.net...
On 2/25/2012 21:55, Ron Frazier (NTP) wrote:
[]
# GPS Lines
server 127.127.20.5 prefer minpoll 3 maxpoll 6 mode 72
fudge 127.127.20.5 time2 0.3100 refid GPS1
# Internet server lines
# NIST N
On 2/26/2012 10:27 AM, unruh wrote:
> On 2012-02-26, Danny Mayer wrote:
>> On 2/26/2012 12:17 AM, Dave Hart wrote:
>>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 03:37, Danny Mayer wrote:
It could well be that rackety is sending KOD packets and this server is
not recognizing them as such. rackety has a he
On 2012-02-26, Danny Mayer wrote:
> On 2/26/2012 12:17 AM, Dave Hart wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 03:37, Danny Mayer wrote:
>>> It could well be that rackety is sending KOD packets and this server is
>>> not recognizing them as such. rackety has a heavy load under normal
>>> circumstances so
On 2/26/2012 12:17 AM, Dave Hart wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 03:37, Danny Mayer wrote:
>> It could well be that rackety is sending KOD packets and this server is
>> not recognizing them as such. rackety has a heavy load under normal
>> circumstances so it may well do so. When it does so the n
On 2012-02-26, Ron Frazier (NTP) wrote:
> On 2/25/2012 6:42 PM, unruh wrote:
>> On 2012-02-25, Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/25/2012 1:20 AM, A C wrote:
>>>
On 2/24/2012 21:26, A C wrote:
> Is it possible to change the polling interval of one or more associ
Ron Frazier (NTP) wrote:
On 2/25/2012 6:42 PM, unruh wrote:
On 2012-02-25, Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
On 2/25/2012 1:20 AM, A C wrote:
On 2/24/2012 21:26, A C wrote:
Is it possible to change the polling interval of one or more
associated
servers at runtime? It seems like I sho
"Richard B. Gilbert" wrote in message
news:x_ednyrcxr9hz9tsnz2dnuvz_rcdn...@giganews.com...
[]
Get ready for a shock. NTPD needs thirty minutes or more to get a
reasonable facsimile of the correct time. To get the microseconds
right, NTPD needs more like ten hours! It's not a very good fit
21 matches
Mail list logo
