Just for interest, I've provided a performance snapshot of a recent NTP
running on Windows-8, with both Internet-only and LAN-based servers.
When running off just Internet (WAN) servers, Windows-8 shows an
averaged jitter of less than a millisecond, perhaps 0.4 - 0.6
millisecond after the
On 28/12/2012 06:53, Kennedy, Paul wrote:
[]
I use the type 20 driver on my pi, and PPS to the GPIO boards works a
treat with an $RMC or $ZDA string.
regards
pk
That's helpful to know, Paul. Do you mean ports rather than boards,
or are you using an add-on board? What modifications did you
Hi,
I've just sorted this out.
Although I followed the guide I linked mostly, I did read this page regarding
known issues and used the configure flags recommended there:
http://ml.linuxpps.org/wiki/index.php/LinuxPPS_NTPD_support
That page has bad advice it appears. After recompiling with the
Yep. My bad.
Definitely the GPIO port.
Pk
On 28/12/2012, at 5:45 PM, David Taylor
david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid wrote:
On 28/12/2012 06:53, Kennedy, Paul wrote:
[]
I use the type 20 driver on my pi, and PPS to the GPIO boards works a
treat with an $RMC or $ZDA string.
On 28/12/2012 10:00, Joshua Small wrote:
Hi,
I've just sorted this out.
Although I followed the guide I linked mostly, I did read this page regarding known
issues and used the configure flags recommended there:
http://ml.linuxpps.org/wiki/index.php/LinuxPPS_NTPD_support
That page has bad
David Taylor wrote:
I'm used to the Windows implementation of NTP, which doesn't have the
same PPS implementation. I guess that the Linux type 20 driver must
The Windows implementation of NTP is w32time (although not in its out of
hte box configuration). Do you actually mean the
On 28/12/2012 14:14, David Woolley wrote:
David Taylor wrote:
I'm used to the Windows implementation of NTP, which doesn't have the
same PPS implementation. I guess that the Linux type 20 driver must
The Windows implementation of NTP is w32time (although not in its out of
hte box
Win 8 is also better at switching tasks according to priority. My Win 8
machine runs 8 Seti@Home (CPU intensive) CPU tasks at the lowest priority
(low) and 2 GPU tasks at the second lowest priority (below normal). There
is no interference with other tasks or with the screen. On versions before
On 28/12/2012 16:10, Uwe Klein wrote:
David Woolley wrote:
David Taylor wrote:
I'm used to the Windows implementation of NTP, which doesn't have the
same PPS implementation. I guess that the Linux type 20 driver must
The Windows implementation of NTP is w32time (although not in its out
David Woolley wrote:
David Taylor wrote:
I'm used to the Windows implementation of NTP, which doesn't have the
same PPS implementation. I guess that the Linux type 20 driver must
The Windows implementation of NTP is w32time (although not in its out of
hte box configuration). Do you
Uwe Klein wrote:
The Windows implementation of NTP is w32time (although not in its out
of hte box configuration). Do you actually mean the reference
implementation built for Windows?
Isn't w32time _S_NTP based?
( and shows discrete adjustments )
Out of the box it is closer to SNTP,
On 2012-12-28, Uwe Klein u...@klein-habertwedt.de wrote:
David Woolley wrote:
David Taylor wrote:
I'm used to the Windows implementation of NTP, which doesn't have the
same PPS implementation. I guess that the Linux type 20 driver must
The Windows implementation of NTP is w32time
unruh wrote:
Is w32time using the ntp packet exchange at all? Ie, do the packets they
send out conform to the ntp standard?
It uses NTPv3 packets. There are some violations. Some may hvae been
removed out of the box, and the others can be removed using registry
settings. The violations
13 matches
Mail list logo
