$8-10 for the crystal would imply a total motherboard price of $2,000+???
Wouldn't that imply $210 vs. $200 price? Why $2,000+?
>
> website.read...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > I can obtain some precision crystals (+/- 2ppm) for about $8 to $10,
> + so why aren't they being added to the mid-level and
On 2013-04-13, website.read...@gmail.com wrote:
> I am running Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, running v4.2.6 ntp, but I am finding that ntp
> is too agressive on clock changes. The loopstats show clock changes up to
> 0.11+ secs which is way too high. I just set the ntp.conf parameter
> "slewalways" to "y
On 2013-04-13, website.read...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday, April 6, 2013 4:18:33 AM UTC-7, Charles Elliott wrote:
>> I would test the local clock before relying on it for time. In the bad old
>> days, around year 2000, when I first started processing SETI@Home (S@H) work
>> units (WUs), I cou
website.read...@gmail.com wrote:
I can obtain some precision crystals (+/- 2ppm) for about $8 to $10,
+ so why aren't they being added to the mid-level and up motherboards?
$8-10 for the crystal would imply a total motherboard price of $2,000+.
I think the big market for high end motherboards
[ Very long lines repaired. ]
website.read...@gmail.com wrote:
I am running Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, running v4.2.6 ntp, but I am finding
+ that ntp is too agressive on clock changes. The loopstats show clock
The normal complaint is that ntpd is too slow at reacting to real
changes in the clock.
+
website.read...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, April 6, 2013 4:18:33 AM UTC-7, Charles Elliott wrote:
I would test the local clock before relying on it for time. In the bad old
days, around year
2000, when I first started processing SETI@Home (S@H) work units (WUs), I could
actually see
that
Unless ntp is over shooting in its corrections, you don't have a problem with
ntp, per say. NTP is configured to slew all corrections less than 0.128
seconds. If after a day to settle down, you still have big jumps, then, you
definitely have a clock problem.
Regards,
Ed
>
> I am running Ubu
On Saturday, April 6, 2013 4:18:33 AM UTC-7, Charles Elliott wrote:
> I would test the local clock before relying on it for time. In the bad old
> days, around year 2000, when I first started processing SETI@Home (S@H) work
> units (WUs), I could actually see that WUs were being processed faster i
I am running Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, running v4.2.6 ntp, but I am finding that ntp is
too agressive on clock changes. The loopstats show clock changes up to 0.11+
secs which is way too high. I just set the ntp.conf parameter "slewalways" to
"yes", hoping that the maximum clock adjustment will be in
