Jan Ceuleers wrote:
Interesting Light Reading article on the degree to which infrastructure
(in casu wireless networks) is dependent on GPS timing signals, how
little is needed to jam GPS (intentionally or otherwise), and what the
impact of such jamming would be.
It also talks about how PTP
unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
On 2013-12-12, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
Jan Ceuleers jan.ceule...@computer.org wrote:
Interesting Light Reading article on the degree to which infrastructure
(in casu wireless networks) is dependent on GPS timing signals, how
little is needed to jam GPS
John Hasler wrote:
In any case designers of things like cell towers should no more assume
that GPS is always just there than they should assume that electric
power is always just there.
This is a _basic_ shortcoming in CDMA as designed and in use.
( think of it as the NTSC of mobile phone
On 13/12/13 04:08, sc0tt.v3r...@gmail.com wrote:
We have several VM's on this host on the same x.x.75.x network so we have set
the xenserver to broadcast ntp (it syncs from network switches) and the VM's to
be broadcast clients . NTP is working ok in this scenario.
This sounds a horribly
I don't know much about VMs and nothing about xenserver, so beware of free
advice. Here are three suggestions off the top of my head.
1. Would it be possible to have NTPD broadcast on both networks, x.x.75.x
and x.x.75.x?
2. Under Windows it appears to be possible to bridge connections on a
I wrote:
In any case designers of things like cell towers should no more assume
that GPS is always just there than they should assume that electric
power is always just there.
Uwe writes:
This is a _basic_ shortcoming in CDMA as designed and in use.
( think of it as the NTSC of mobile phone
John Hasler wrote:
I wrote:
In any case designers of things like cell towers should no more assume
that GPS is always just there than they should assume that electric
power is always just there.
Uwe writes:
This is a _basic_ shortcoming in CDMA as designed and in use.
( think of it as the
On 12/7/2013 7:35 PM, Magnus Danielson wrote:
On 12/07/2013 11:39 PM, Harlan Stenn wrote:
Magnus Danielson writes:
The drift-file-accelerated lock-in isn't robust. Current behavior of
response isn't very useful for most people experiencing it.
I'm not sure I'd agree with the word most. It's
