On 21/05/14 19:08, E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the
BlackLists wrote:
William Unruh wrote:> BlackLists wrote:
Otherwise make sure that the cable is terminated with the appropriate
resistance. (50 ohm I believe for Cat 5). Note that source had better be
able to drive that imped
Antonio Marcheselli wrote:
>>
>> You can try "traceroute -U -p 123 ip.ad.dr.es" to see where it is being
>> blocked, and if it is nearby to your ISP complain to your ISP about it.
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> Here is a standard traceroute
>
> xxx-2:~# traceroute 130.88.200.4
> traceroute to 130.88.200.4 (13
You can try "traceroute -U -p 123 ip.ad.dr.es" to see where it is being
blocked, and if it is nearby to your ISP complain to your ISP about it.
Hi,
Here is a standard traceroute
xxx-2:~# traceroute 130.88.200.4
traceroute to 130.88.200.4 (130.88.200.4), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 1
On 2014-05-21, Martin Burnicki wrote:
> E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists wrote:
>> Martin Burnicki wrote:
>>> I've recently started to write a whitepaper about computer time
>>> synchronization. It is not yet complete but already contains a lot of
>>> basic information w
On -10.01.-28163 20:59, Antonio Marcheselli wrote:
> Apologies, I sent a reply to your personal email by mistake -
> Thunderbird has it as default.
(Are you accessing via USENET, or via mailinglist? The latter's run by
MailMan and if I'm not very much mistaken, there's a pertinent setting
in your
E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists wrote:
Martin Burnicki wrote:
I've recently started to write a whitepaper about computer time
synchronization. It is not yet complete but already contains a lot of
basic information which may be helpful for folks who are not very
famili
Antonio Marcheselli wrote:
On 21/05/2014 03:27, E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the
BlackLists wrote:
Antonio Marcheselli wrote:
Version is 4.2.4p (yes, I know. It's the same version I've been talking
about and I cannot upgrade it unfortunately).
When running ntpq -p I've got this
David Taylor wrote:
On 20/05/2014 08:24, Martin Burnicki wrote:
[]
I've recently started to write a whitepaper about computer time
synchronization. It is not yet complete but already contains a lot of
basic information which may be helpful for folks who are not very
familiar with that stuff.
[]
mike cook wrote:
>>>
If I keep pinging different pools,
I can find another NTP server which replies.
>>>
>>> Seems strange, that would imply that the server 130.88.200.4
>>> (or their ISP) is blocking your client?
>>>
>>>
>
> I regularly get inaccessible servers returned by pool
