On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
Terje Mathisen terje.mathi...@tmsw.no wrote:
it would seem to
be a nice NTPD startum 1 server.
Of course, it could still be good enough when you want to use it as a
network time server.
Which is what was suggested. After
Terje Mathisen terje.mathi...@tmsw.no wrote:
http://linuxgizmos.com/tiny-fanless-mini-pc-runs-linux-on-quad-core-amd-soc/
This little guy starts at $129 and includes a serial port which should
make it trivial to attach a Sure GPS board.
With a dual or quad 64-bit CPU, both SATA and SD
Paul tik-...@bodosom.net wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
Terje Mathisen terje.mathi...@tmsw.no wrote:
it would seem to
be a nice NTPD startum 1 server.
Of course, it could still be good enough when you want to use it as a
network time server.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Terje Mathisen terje.mathi...@tmsw.no
wrote:
[Fitlet] includes a serial port which should make it trivial to attach a
Sure GPS board.
If they use a standard pinout. The PC-2i didn't support DCD which makes it
not quite trivial.
Hopefully the hardware
Paul wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
It was suggested as a high-perf NTP server
That string is not in the message. It's not a quote despite your quotation
marks.
Not in my msg, but in the subject of the entire thread. :-)
Terje
--
- Terje.Mathisen
Rob wrote:
Terje Mathisen terje.mathi...@tmsw.no wrote:
http://linuxgizmos.com/tiny-fanless-mini-pc-runs-linux-on-quad-core-amd-soc/
This little guy starts at $129 and includes a serial port which should
make it trivial to attach a Sure GPS board.
With a dual or quad 64-bit CPU, both SATA and
Paul tik-...@bodosom.net wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
It was suggested as a high-perf NTP server
That string is not in the message. It's not a quote despite your quotation
marks.
It's in the subject, idiot!
Hal Murray writes:
Is there a reasonable HOWTO type document describing how to set things
up?
Several years ago, Dave announced that one of the machines at UDel was
ready for testers. I got as far as discovering that Autokey doesn't
work through NAT boxes. Since I'm behind a NAT box, I
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 2:20 PM, David Taylor
david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid wrote:
.. although expensive compared to a Raspberry Pi, if somewhat better in
potential performance.
Among my (S1) clique of clocks the leading predictor of offset is network
connection not cpu.
As you might
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
It was suggested as a high-perf NTP server
That string is not in the message. It's not a quote despite your quotation
marks.
___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
Is there a reasonable HOWTO type document describing how to set things up?
Several years ago, Dave announced that one of the machines at UDel was ready
for testers. I got as far as discovering that Autokey doesn't work through
NAT boxes. Since I'm behind a NAT box, I gave up.
I should be
On 15/01/15 07:56, Terje Mathisen wrote:
Did we have a leap second last June? Or did you intend to check for 2015?
Oops. I did get it right in the dry run, but not in the run I actually
used:
david@dhcppc4:~$ TZ=/usr/share/zoneinfo/right/UTC date -d '30 June 2015
86400 seconds'
Wed Jul
Hi,
On 01/15/2015 03:06 AM, Harlan Stenn wrote:
I'm trying to figure out if anybody is actively using autokey, in a
production deployment.
If you are, please let me know - I have some questions for you.
We use it to pull leap-second info off the NTP servers.
It took some effort to get it
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Terje Mathisen terje.mathi...@tmsw.no
wrote:
Not in my msg, but in the subject of the entire thread. :-)
I'm so used to nomail@example being wrong I had a knee-jerk reaction. My
bad.
This does give me the chance to ask what a high-perf NTP server might be.
Once upon a time, Phil W Lee p...@lee-family.me.uk said:
For the tiny number of programs which really need UTC (not TAI), it
would just be a different number, but the only thing I know of which
really needs UTC rather than TAI would be programs to assist with
astronomy or astral navigation.
I
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 9:23 PM, William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
This does give me the chance to ask what a high-perf NTP server might be.
I would have assumed the accuracy with which ntpd disciplines the computer
The jitter variability (from loopstats) on one of my clocks is ~1e-7, on
David Woolley wrote:
On 15/01/15 07:56, Terje Mathisen wrote:
Did we have a leap second last June? Or did you intend to check for 2015?
Oops. I did get it right in the dry run, but not in the run I actually
used:
david@dhcppc4:~$ TZ=/usr/share/zoneinfo/right/UTC date -d '30 June 2015
cmad...@cmadams.net (Chris Adams) wrote:
Once upon a time, Phil W Lee p...@lee-family.me.uk said:
For the tiny number of programs which really need UTC (not TAI), it
would just be a different number, but the only thing I know of which
really needs UTC rather than TAI would be programs to
Paul wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Terje Mathisen terje.mathi...@tmsw.no
wrote:
Not in my msg, but in the subject of the entire thread. :-)
I'm so used to nomail@example being wrong I had a knee-jerk reaction. My
bad.
This does give me the chance to ask what a high-perf NTP
Terje Mathisen writes:
cmad...@cmadams.net (Chris Adams) wrote:
Also, you can't properly represent future timestamps (necessary for some
things) as seconds since an epoch, and that's pretty widely used. By
that I mean that the number of seconds between 2015-06-30 23:59:00 and
2015-07-01
On 2015-01-15, Paul tik-...@bodosom.net wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Terje Mathisen terje.mathi...@tmsw.no
wrote:
Not in my msg, but in the subject of the entire thread. :-)
I'm so used to nomail@example being wrong I had a knee-jerk reaction. My
bad.
This does give me the
David Woolley wrote:
On 14/01/15 16:37, Terje Mathisen wrote:
The calls I'm thinking of are those you make to convert an OS-supplied
time_t (file) system timestamp to YMDHMS etc.
Those calls have no need to be in the kernel, and they are not in
Unix/Linux systems.
The standard
On 15/01/15 03:06, Harlan Stenn wrote:
I'm trying to figure out if anybody is actively using autokey, in a
production deployment.
If you are, please let me know - I have some questions for you.
That's in my TO-DO list since at least 2011. When I tried to configure
it at the time and on the
On 2015-01-15 00:32, Yon Sareourn wrote:
Dear All ,
Good afternoon,
I want to configuration NTP Server, would you provide us with material that i
need ?
Thank you ,
http://doc.ntp.org
--
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis
___
questions mailing list
http://linuxgizmos.com/tiny-fanless-mini-pc-runs-linux-on-quad-core-amd-soc/
This little guy starts at $129 and includes a serial port which should
make it trivial to attach a Sure GPS board.
With a dual or quad 64-bit CPU, both SATA and SD storage connectors and
versions that support
25 matches
Mail list logo
