Re: [ntp:questions] Request to test patch for ntpd

2015-01-29 Thread Martin Burnicki
David, David Taylor wrote: On 28/01/2015 17:30, Martin Burnicki wrote: We have already run the following tests successfully: - parse driver (driver 8) with built-in PPS enabled - parse driver 8 without built-in PPS, but ATOM in addition - network peer marked as "prefer", and ATOM in addition

Re: [ntp:questions] Request to test patch for ntpd

2015-01-29 Thread David Taylor
On 28/01/2015 17:30, Martin Burnicki wrote: Hi all, several months ago I have opened NTP bug #2592 "Leap second warning from refclock lost, and time offsets may not be accepted if refclock driver uses PPS" http://bugs.ntp.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2592 By intensive testing with the current NTP tarbal