dear all,
maybe i misunderstand this command. if i drop one interface all others
disappear.
is this what it should do ? ( see below )
my environment sun sparc solaris 10 with ntp version 4.2.8p2
my sparc server has 4 nic's. 3 of them are cabled, plumbed and up. no virtual
interface
kind
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 12:31:18PM -0400, Jim Witschey wrote:
Thanks for the pointer, Chris -- that didn't seem to help, though. I'd
been setting the clock to 23:50, and INS wasn't set at midnight when I
changing that to 23:45.
With what ntp version are you trying this and does is it have a
Hello:
All I can say is, it does that sometimes. I think what might be
happening is that ntpq caught ntpd before the reachability register was
updated, although it updates that fairly early in the game. You can see the
code in proto.c in a recent source distribution, like here:
Dear all,
Thanks for your detailed reply.
@Charles, if I unplug my 1-Gbit internet line then about 250 user are not
happy. An my supervisor too. But I know how to simulate this.
It happened on an internal ntp server with version 4.2.8p1 with a peer
connection to another internal and 2
Dear all,
Thanks for your detailed reply.
@Charles, if I unplug my 1-Gbit internet line then about 250 user are not
happy. An my supervisor too. But I know how to simulate this.
It happened on an internal ntp server with version 4.2.8p1 with a peer
connection to another internal and 2
Folks,
I want to apologize for the recent problems we’ve had with the mail servers for
ntp.org and the mailing list server at lists.ntp.org.
We’ve had some systems go unexpectedly south on us, with unexpected
consequences. We’re in the process of putting things back together, and
hopefully
On 4/8/2015 9:23 AM, MAYER Hans wrote:
Dear all,
I have a question about the reachability register. For my opinion this is a
left shift 8-bit register.
I looked in one of our internal ntp-server with ntpq and found a value of
376 to a peer configured internal server. After waiting the
