Re: [ntp:questions] How to keep fake time in past/future?

> Le 5 déc. 2017 à 18:04, William Unruh a écrit : > > On 2017-12-05, romain.cordonn...@gmail.com > wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I have the same need as Cristian. >> >> I am working on a data processing project which is designed to run for 25 >>

Re: [ntp:questions] How to keep fake time in past/future?

On 2017-12-05, romain.cordonn...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi All, > > I have the same need as Cristian. > > I am working on a data processing project which is designed to run for 25 > years. > > The customer wants us to run data processing simulation at any time >

Re: [ntp:questions] More than one PPS source on Raspberry Pi?

On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 04:25:26PM -0500, Brian Utterback wrote: > Doesn't adding a second PPS signal mean that the accuracy can only go down? > If the two PPS signals are really in sync then they will be clocking > essentially simultaneously. They won't get serviced simultaneously so one > will

Re: [ntp:questions] More than one PPS source on Raspberry Pi?

I've always thought having multiple PPS sources on a single machine wouldn't work because the PPS interrupts would occur at the same time, causing random offsets and jitter to show up on the PPS sources since the interrupts would be queued in an essentially random order and processed