Re: [ntp:questions] Conflicting information on packet field types

2018-11-01 Thread Steven Sommars
On the poll field. Earlier RFCs are obsoleted by RFC5905, plus there are some terminology changes/errors when comparing documents. Even staying within RFC5905 terminology can be inconsistent: it contains a mixture of "on-the-wire" data field definitions, algorithms, and code. My interpretation:

Re: [ntp:questions] NTPd server using DVB-T as clocksource

2018-11-01 Thread Chris Cappuccio
Lars Schotte [l...@gustik.eu] wrote: > Well, I know that OpenBSD currently has no support for DVB-T but Linux > does, so I would run that RaspberryPi with Linux. However, the question > would be how to pair its output with OpenNTPd or NTPd. > OpenBSD actually does support some of the ugen userlan

Re: [ntp:questions] Conflicting information on packet field types

2018-11-01 Thread Jason Rabel
I was mainly reading RFC 5905 since it's the latest, but it does make some references back to the older RFC 4330 (SNTP). I believe it is that document (and others) that seem to flip-flop on what is signed / unsigned. i.e. 5905 says poll interval is signed, 4330 says poll interval is unsigned. I du