Re: [ntp:questions] Time server question

2019-07-17 Thread William Unruh
On 2019-07-17, Chris wrote: > > Next thing to try is the parallel port ack line pps and would be I had some indication that the parallel port was faster. > interesting to add a second pps signal to see how that affects the > result. Interesting project for the summer anyway... I suspect it will

Re: [ntp:questions] Time server question

2019-07-17 Thread Chris
On 07/13/19 16:38, Chris wrote: On 06/20/19 23:39, Chris wrote: Have a couple of surplus gps based ntp servers that have been used for time sync in the lab for few years. They are on a UPS with several hours backup and seems like a good idea to use them to contribute to the ntp global network.

Re: [ntp:questions] Time server question

2019-07-17 Thread Chris
On 07/17/19 12:59, William Unruh wrote: > I had some indication that the parallel port was faster. That would make sense, since the rs232 devices tend to be slew rate limited for noise rejection. Found some DS8921 driver / receiver devices, originally designed for hard drive data path use. Delay