In article Miroslav Lichvar
writes:
>On 2019-08-14, Per Hedeland wrote:
>> Anyway, back to the FreeBSD post, it seems there are actually two
>> questions:
>>
>> 1) Is the ~ 200 usec offset reported by ntpd really semi-constant (and
>>thus "easy to deal with")?
>
>My understanding is that th
In article Miroslav Lichvar
writes:
>On 2019-08-11, Per Hedeland wrote:
>> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-usb/2019-August/016078.html
>>
>> TL;DR^2 The author carried out a pretty sophisticated (IMHO) test with
>> two different USB-to-serial adapters feeding PPS to ntpd, and found
In article Jakob Bohm
writes:
>On 11/08/2019 15:44, Per Hedeland wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Since the idea of using a USB-to-serial adapter for PPS is often
>> dismissed here as more or less pointless/useless, (due to the inherent
>> delays in the USB communication AFAIU), I found this recent post to
In article Jakob Bohm
writes:
>On 13/08/2019 13:24, Per Hedeland wrote:
>> In article Jakob Bohm
> writes:
>>> On 11/08/2019 15:44, Per Hedeland wrote:
Hi,
Since the idea of using a USB-to-serial adapter for PPS is often
dismissed here as more or less pointless/useless, (due
I'm using the stock ntp binary from centos 7.x and I'm seeing this:
[ctrevino@ntp-eqix-sv5 ~]$ rpm -qa | grep ntp
ntpdate-4.2.6p5-25.el7.centos.2.x86_64
ntp-4.2.6p5-25.el7.centos.2.x86_64
[ctrevino@ntp-eqix-sv5 ~]$
[ctrevino@ntp-eqix-sv5 ~]$
[ctrevino@ntp-eqix-sv5 ~]$ ntpq -c mru
***Command `mru'
