ppen ?
I'm trying to force ntp-dev-4.2.5p179 to work with IFF crypto scheme.
Key generation with ntp-keygen looks OK, both keys and certificates are
loaded by ntp but the communication does not work.
Thank you very much for your help,
Best Regards,
G
Hi again,
ok, sorry, that was my mistake (about cooperation of -e and -q) I was
reading the old documentation.
Best Regards,
Grzegorz
Grzegorz Daniluk wrote:
> Hi David,
> Why -e and -q options together are confusing ? As I understand correctly
> by -q we give the password to the
values we need to provide the password since the private key is
encrypted with des-cbc. Shouldn't they (-e and -q) cooperate ?
Best Regards,
Grzegorz Daniluk
David Mills wrote:
> Grzegorz,
>
> Using -e and -q on the same command linke is very confusing.
>
> Dave
>
> D
I know that you wrote the autokey does not work correctly in release
versions of ntp, but just to compare, please take a look what ntp-keygen
v4.2.4p7 prints out when using with '-e' option:
%ntp-keygen -e -q serverpasswd -p clientpasswd > group.key
%cat group.key
# ntpkey_IFFkey_NTS-MAILING.345
I have
> nothing more to tell you. I am done with this mission. You should ask
> for help elsewhere.
>
> Dave
>
> Grzegorz Daniluk wrote:
>
>
>> This problem I have with ntp-4.2.5p179.
>>
>> best regards,
>> Grzegorz
>>
>> Grzegorz Dan
7;
option.
thank you for your suggestions,
best regards,
Grzegorz Daniluk
David Mills wrote:
> Grzegorz ,
>
> Please review your Unix documentation on how to redirect standare outpu.
> I see no ">" character on your command line. Also, including both a -e
> and -q option
This problem I have with ntp-4.2.5p179.
best regards,
Grzegorz
Grzegorz Daniluk wrote:
> Hi,
> Thank you David for your patience and answers. I understand what you
> wrote. However, maybe once again, here is the full procedure I'm using
> to generate those parameters for IFF
7;-e' parameter.
thank you very much for your advise,
best regards,
Grzegorz Daniluk
David Mills wrote:
> Grzegorz,
>
> I think this has been said before: Autokey does not work properly in the
> current release version.That version includes a mongrel of old and new
> files t
he client parameters are
> redirected to a specified file, usually using the > filename on the
> command line.
>
> Dave
>
> Grzegorz Daniluk wrote:
>
>> Hello, again
>> David, I tried using latest development version (4.2.5p179). However,
>> ntp-keygen there
ad of exporting the public values for those
previously generated.
Thank you in advance,
Best Regards,
Grzegorz Daniluk
David Mills wrote:
> Grzegorz,
>
> On rereading your message I learn that you are using the release
> version. That versio has an incompatible mix of old and new
Mills wrote:
> Grzegorz,
>
> With reference to the documentation, you act as a trusted agent (TA) to
> generate cryptographic media for a trusted host (TH) whose name is
> specifiied in the -s option of ntp-keygen.
>
> Dave
>
> Grzegorz Daniluk wrote:
>
>
>>
er A.
When I've generated self-signed certificate and keys on the server A
(then running ntp-keygen without '-s' option) everything works fine.
Thank you in advance,
Best Regards,
Grzegorz Daniluk
___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
having
stratum 12 number) had '*' in ntpq when ocxo and rubidium had '+'
(having stratum 8 number)for all the time). During that all of the
sources had very nice and nearly the same delay, offset and jitter.
Has someone any idea why it behaved so strange with pps sources?
change any configuration of ntp or keys,
it was just working for a few days continuously.
Did anyone saw something like that before ?
Thank you,
best regards,
Grzegorz Daniluk
___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
https://lists.ntp.org/mailma
Steve Kostecke pisze:
> On 2008-07-23, Grzegorz Daniluk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You're complicating matters by using ntpdc.
>
> Just edit the server lines in ntpd.conf and restart ntpd. If you're
> using iburst on the other server lines ntpd will be ready to
Steve Kostecke wrote:
> On 2008-07-23, Grzegorz Daniluk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Thank you very much, that is exactly what I was looking for.
>> Now I have another question. I would like to change the poll interval
>> for those 'noselect' hosts so
onf_peer size
***Server reports a format error in the received packet (shouldn't happen)
The other flags works perfect, I got these messages only with noselect.
So maybe I also need to add some code to ntpd so that it would
understand a message with no
ely audit the ntp server's
time without synchronizing to it.
And btw. another question, what is the maximum amount of servers that
can be put into the ntp.conf so that ntpd would still work correctly.
Grzegorz Daniluk
___
questions maili
ce between the system that I
know is ntpd server and my ntp server but that remote machine is not the
time server for me (I'm not synchronizing my time to that server)
Grzegorz Daniluk
___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
Steve Kostecke wrote:
> ntpq -p will show the offset between your ntpd and a remote time server.
Yes, I know that, but I can't have that time servers whose time
difference I'm checking on my servers list in ntp.conf(i don't want ntpd
to start synchronize to them).
So finally I need to have some s
Steve Kostecke pisze:
> On 2008-07-11, lin_g <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Have anybody tried using ntpdate with iff and rsa keys on the time
>> server ? There is no problem when using symmetric md5 keys (-k and
>> -a options for ntpdate) but i have no idea how to force ntpdate to
>> use the
21 matches
Mail list logo
