Re: [ntp:questions] ntpdate

2009-06-17 Thread Scott Haneda
Hi Danny, thanks for your comments... Replies below... On Jun 14, 2009, at 9:00 PM, Danny Mayer wrote: Scott Haneda wrote: I am only looking for the basics of keeping my system clock in sync on OS X 10.5. On OS X 10.5 the clock will drift badly on a machine that is not logged

Re: [ntp:questions] ntpdate

2009-06-15 Thread Scott Haneda
On Jun 15, 2009, at 8:59 AM, Todd Glassey CISM CIFI wrote: You should be running ntpd as a daemon. That will keep the clock in synch and you never have to touch it. Which creates an audit issue and security profile which always needs to be watched. NTPD is not the answer for everyone

Re: [ntp:questions] ntpdate

2009-06-15 Thread Scott Haneda
Hi Danny, thanks for your comments... Replies below... On Jun 14, 2009, at 9:00 PM, Danny Mayer wrote: Scott Haneda wrote: I am only looking for the basics of keeping my system clock in sync on OS X 10.5. On OS X 10.5 the clock will drift badly on a machine that is not logged

Re: [ntp:questions] ntpdate

2009-06-10 Thread Scott Haneda
On Jun 9, 2009, at 8:30 PM, Danny Mayer wrote: Scott Haneda wrote: Hello, I am not sure this is the correct list, but it is the closest I could find. I hope there is someone here who can at least point me in the correct direction. I am having trouble with `ntpdate` on OS X, using

Re: [ntp:questions] .1 Microsecond Synchronization

2009-06-05 Thread Scott Haneda
On Jun 5, 2009, at 3:58 PM, Rick Jones rick.jon...@hp.com wrote: No it requires the network to send the time when requested. Eg, Rogers in Canada (GSM) does deliver the time but I have no idea what its accuracy is. How dumb... something like time-of-day should be broadcast just like cell