Kasper Pedersen wrote in message
news:4ad360ef$0$36567$edfad...@dtext01.news.tele.dk...
[]
I built a device that spits out priority tagged ethernet frames with
200ns error to UTC, and did a number of tests with different networks
and nics, the result of which is in a table here:
David J Taylor david-tay...@blueyonder.not-this-part.nor-this.co.uk.invalid
wrote:
Unruh unruh-s...@physics.ubc.ca wrote in message
news:qsbam.47742$db2.29...@edtnps83...
[]
Actually those Gb ethernet switches seems to have some really bad and
variable
latencies. My system, before they
Unruh unruh-s...@physics.ubc.ca wrote in message
news:qsbam.47742$db2.29...@edtnps83...
[]
Actually those Gb ethernet switches seems to have some really bad and
variable
latencies. My system, before they installed Gb switches, had a
consistant
roundtrip of 140 usec and gave better than
David J Taylor david-tay...@blueyonder.not-this-part.nor-this.co.uk.invalid
writes:
Unruh unruh-s...@physics.ubc.ca wrote in message
news:qsbam.47742$db2.29...@edtnps83...
[]
Actually those Gb ethernet switches seems to have some really bad and
variable
latencies. My system, before they
Unruh unruh-s...@physics.ubc.ca wrote in message
news:fhjam.47784$db2.22...@edtnps83...
[]
Most interesting, Bill. Mine is a relatively cheap and cheerful device
from Netgear (GS608):
http://www.netgear.co.uk/ethernet_network_switch_gs605.php
so whether being very simple and unmanaged is
David J Taylor david-tay...@blueyonder.not-this-part.nor-this.co.uk.invalid
writes:
Unruh unruh-s...@physics.ubc.ca wrote in message
news:fhjam.47784$db2.22...@edtnps83...
[]
Most interesting, Bill. Mine is a relatively cheap and cheerful device
from Netgear (GS608):