I'd like to draw this list's attention to an idea that Reyk Floeter
floated, namely to use TLS to help sanity-check NTP timestamps:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=142356166731390&w=2
___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp
Jan Ceuleers wrote:
I'd like to draw this list's attention to an idea that Reyk Floeter
floated, namely to use TLS to help sanity-check NTP timestamps:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=142356166731390&w=2
Isn't public/private signed timestamps far better?
If you can't get that, and are too
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 02:29:54PM +0100, Terje Mathisen wrote:
> Jan Ceuleers wrote:
> >I'd like to draw this list's attention to an idea that Reyk Floeter
> >floated, namely to use TLS to help sanity-check NTP timestamps:
> >
> >http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=142356166731390&w=2
> >
> Isn't p
Miroslav Lichvar writes:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 02:29:54PM +0100, Terje Mathisen wrote:
> > Jan Ceuleers wrote:
> > >I'd like to draw this list's attention to an idea that Reyk Floeter
> > >floated, namely to use TLS to help sanity-check NTP timestamps:
> > >
> > >http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tec