On 2014-07-12, Brian Inglis wrote:
> On 2014-07-11 00:51, vothanhhun...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I read and followed as the link Martin suggest and I tried to
>> find the latest version. Can you check for me if this link is
>> the latest because I tried this link but it is not working.
>>
On 2014-07-11 00:51, vothanhhun...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I read and followed as the link Martin suggest and I tried to
find the latest version. Can you check for me if this link is
the latest because I tried this link but it is not working.
I tried set minpool to 9 but it doesn't work.
On -10.01.-28163 20:59, vothanhhun...@gmail.com wrote:
> In my case (as William explained) it is
(translation: what I *want* to do is)
> not a normal clock rate sync
(translation: not rate adjustments and (then) slewing to get rid of the
offset, as ntpd tries to do)
> but just a copy time from
On 11/07/14 09:46, Martin Burnicki wrote:
not a normal clock rate sync but just a copy time
He means ntpdate in step mode. He clearly has something badly broken
and is trying to use ntpd as sticking plaster, rather than fixing the
problem.
___
qu
Brian Inglis wrote:
Never had a problem keeping within a few ms offset from UTC with
only good network sources, Windows 7 x64, and NTP 4.2.6p5 stable.
As far as I have seen this may depend. On some systems it works, on
others it doesn't which means the time synchronization doesn't settle.
I'
On 11/07/14 07:51, vothanhhun...@gmail.com wrote:
In my case (as William explained) it is not a normal clock rate sync
but just a copy time from ntp server to machine clock. So what I am
wondering now is if it is right in my situation to use ntp to "sync"
from ntp server.
w32time is good enoug
vothanhhun...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I read and followed as the link Martin suggest and I tried to find the latest
version. Can you check for me if this link is the latest because I tried this
link but it is not working. I tried set minpool to 9 but it doesn't work.
In the message to which
On 11/07/2014 07:51, vothanhhun...@gmail.com wrote:
[]
The machine I am trying to "sync" is a VPS machine.
VPS is what? A virtual PC?
--
Cheers,
David
Web: http://www.satsignal.eu
___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.
On 10/07/2014 23:51, David Woolley wrote:
On 10/07/14 09:23, David Taylor wrote:
although Windows can be kept within a millisecond,
But the uncertainty in the delay between real world events and
application programs reading the corresponding time is likely to be
rather larger.
Unless the int
On 11/07/14 07:51, vothanhhun...@gmail.com wrote:
I tried set minpool to 9
That's part of your problem, not the soluction. Leave it at 6.
___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
vothanhhun...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> I have reinstalled ntp again and do the same as the guide above and I want to
> know if I can configure the sync interval to test if the program is working
> correctly. So I put the minpool parameter with value 9 and wait but there is
> nothing hap
Hi all,
I read and followed as the link Martin suggest and I tried to find the latest
version. Can you check for me if this link is the latest because I tried this
link but it is not working. I tried set minpool to 9 but it doesn't work.
Here is the link:
http://www.satsignal.eu/ntp/x86/ntp-4.2
On 2014-07-10 08:43, Martin Burnicki wrote:
Brian Inglis wrote:
You can start ntpd with -g option which allows it to step your system
time once,
when it first starts; using iburst "pool hk.ntp.pool.org iburst" will
allow the
correct offset to be set within about 16s after startup. Thereafter it
On 10/07/14 09:23, David Taylor wrote:
although Windows can be kept within a millisecond,
But the uncertainty in the delay between real world events and
application programs reading the corresponding time is likely to be
rather larger.
(Also, at least the past, ntpd only compensated well fo
On 10/07/14 09:24, vothanhhun...@gmail.com wrote:
It is always 1 or 2 minutes behind compare to the ntp server.
Please explain. You appear to be describing a seriously broken machine.
ntpd is not a cure for broken machines.
___
questions mailing
On 2014-07-10, vothanhhun...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, July 10, 2014 10:49:55 AM UTC+7, William Unruh wrote:
>> On 2014-07-10, vothanhhun...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> > On Thursday, July 10, 2014 3:53:42 AM UTC+7, David Woolley wrote:
>> >> On 09/07/14 18:30, E-Mail Sent to this address will
Brian Inglis wrote:
You can start ntpd with -g option which allows it to step your system
time once,
when it first starts; using iburst "pool hk.ntp.pool.org iburst" will
allow the
correct offset to be set within about 16s after startup. Thereafter it
will stay
within +/-128ms of UTC; after it ha
On 2014-07-10 02:24, vothanhhun...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, July 10, 2014 10:49:55 AM UTC+7, William Unruh wrote:
On 2014-07-10, vothanhhun...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, July 10, 2014 3:53:42 AM UTC+7, David Woolley wrote:
On 09/07/14 18:30, E-Mail Sent to this address will be added t
vothanhhun...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Currently, I am working with meinberg ntp and I can't sync with ntp server. I
have made rules that allow UDP port 123, turned off w32time and change to some
popular ntp server but there is no luck.
I have followed this FAQ:
http://www.meinbergglobal.com/
On 07/10/2014 10:24 AM, vothanhhun...@gmail.com wrote:
> Thanks for your explaination. The reason I use NTP because I want my
> computer clock have the same time as the server. It is always 1 or 2
> minutes behind compare to the ntp server.
I admit that it *is* odd that ntpd doesn't change that *e
On 10/07/2014 08:39, David Woolley wrote:
[]
As others have noted, precision time means widely differing things to
different people, ranging from the unachievable to cases where ntpd is
overkill. Many people would have a definition of precision time which
is unachievable on Windows, as Windows i
On Thursday, July 10, 2014 10:49:55 AM UTC+7, William Unruh wrote:
> On 2014-07-10, vothanhhun...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, July 10, 2014 3:53:42 AM UTC+7, David Woolley wrote:
>
> >> On 09/07/14 18:30, E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the
>
> >>
>
> >> BlackLists wrote
On 10/07/14 03:07, vothanhhun...@gmail.com wrote:
After 2 hours it can sync now but I would expect it sync every 15
minutes because my program need precision time.
To speed up initial sync use iburst.
Your non-standard minpoll is contributing to the slow synchronisation.
However note that, in
On 2014-07-10, vothanhhun...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, July 10, 2014 3:53:42 AM UTC+7, David Woolley wrote:
>> On 09/07/14 18:30, E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the
>>
>> BlackLists wrote:
>>
>> > vothanhhun...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> >> remote refid st
On 2014-07-09, vothanhhun...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> I have reinstalled ntp again and do the same as the guide above and I want to
> know if I can configure the sync interval to test if the program is working
> correctly. So I put the minpool parameter with value 9 and wait but there is
On Thursday, July 10, 2014 3:53:42 AM UTC+7, David Woolley wrote:
> On 09/07/14 18:30, E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the
>
> BlackLists wrote:
>
> > vothanhhun...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >> remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset
> >> jitter
>
> >>
On 09/07/14 18:30, E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the
BlackLists wrote:
vothanhhun...@gmail.com wrote:
remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter
==
*218.189.210.3 137
vothanhhun...@gmail.com wrote:
> remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter
> ==
> *218.189.210.3 137.189.4.10 2 u- 512 17 30.634 -46.455 23.503
--^ It is synced !
> ass
On 09/07/2014 12:26, vothanhhun...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
I have reinstalled ntp again and do the same as the guide above and I want to
know if I can configure the sync interval to test if the program is working
correctly. So I put the minpool parameter with value 9 and wait but there is
Hi David,
I have reinstalled ntp again and do the same as the guide above and I want to
know if I can configure the sync interval to test if the program is working
correctly. So I put the minpool parameter with value 9 and wait but there is
nothing happend.
Did I miss something here?
On 09/07/2014 08:31, vothanhhun...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Currently, I am working with meinberg ntp and I can't sync with ntp server. I
have made rules that allow UDP port 123, turned off w32time and change to some
popular ntp server but there is no luck.
I have followed this FAQ:
http://ww
Hi all,
Currently, I am working with meinberg ntp and I can't sync with ntp server. I
have made rules that allow UDP port 123, turned off w32time and change to some
popular ntp server but there is no luck.
I have followed this FAQ:
http://www.meinbergglobal.com/english/info/ntp-w32time.htm
I'
32 matches
Mail list logo
