Mischanko, Edward T wrote:
Thank you for your time in explaining this to me. Unfortunately, my
*> mathematics education stopped at intermediate algebra; it appears
*> that the formula is in calculus? Anyway, I feel like I have beaten
The real point was to indicate that a formula isn't the mo
questions@lists.ntp.org
> Subject: Re: [ntp:questions] FW: Clock Offset
>
> unruh wrote:
> > On 2012-12-22, Mischanko, Edward T
> wrote:
>
> >> I do not doubt you, but if they are measuring different
> things
> >> to represent the same thing, then there is a
unruh wrote:
On 2012-12-22, Mischanko, Edward T wrote:
I do not doubt you, but if they are measuring different things
to represent the same thing, then there is a formula off
somewhere?
No, they do not "represent the same thing". They are different things.
One is the instantaneously measure
On 2012-12-22, Mischanko, Edward T wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Mischanko, Edward T
>> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 9:14 PM
>> Subject: RE: [ntp:questions] Clock Offset
>>
>>
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: questions-
>> > bounces+edward.mischanko=arcelormittal..
> -Original Message-
> From: Mischanko, Edward T
> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 9:14 PM
> Subject: RE: [ntp:questions] Clock Offset
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: questions-
> > bounces+edward.mischanko=arcelormittal@lists.ntp.org
> > [mailto:questions-
> > bounces+e
