Re: [ntp:questions] NTP-PPS standalone operation: How to ignore network interface changes?

2015-06-12 Thread Joachim Fabini
Perhaps my statement was ambiguous, here's a next try. Although in the meanwhile we found the culprit and it's NOT ntp, I still consider it worth to post the solution as others might experience similar problems. Sorry for the noise. Our Setup: Stand-alone (Ubuntu) Linux desktop computer, GPS/PPS c

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP-PPS standalone operation: How to ignore network interface changes?

2015-06-12 Thread Marco Marongiu
On 12/06/15 11:54, Joachim Fabini wrote: > The straight-forward solution that you propose was the one that I tried > first. Unfortunately it does not work. Then I guess I don't understand what you're after exactly. I'll re-read your message entirely and check what I misunderstood. Sorry for the no

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP-PPS standalone operation: How to ignore network interface changes?

2015-06-12 Thread Joachim Fabini
The straight-forward solution that you propose was the one that I tried first. Unfortunately it does not work. But we might have found one (the?) solution: Build ntp from sources and replace the line #define HAS_ROUTING_SOCKET 1 by #undef HAS_ROUTING_SOCKET in configure.h (_after_ running configur

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP-PPS standalone operation: How to ignore network interface changes?

2015-06-12 Thread Marco Marongiu
On 12/06/15 10:07, Joachim Fabini wrote: > I want ntp to listen exclusively to the local GPS/PPS > signal (server 127.127.20.0) and ignore all other network interfaces, > messages, events Use the interface directive, e.g.: interface ignore all interface listen 127.127.20.0 Ciao -- bronto __

[ntp:questions] NTP-PPS standalone operation: How to ignore network interface changes?

2015-06-12 Thread Joachim Fabini
Does anyone know how to stop ntpd to listen to local network interface changes? That is, I want ntp to listen exclusively to the local GPS/PPS signal (server 127.127.20.0) and ignore all other network interfaces, messages, events, etc. Background: I'm using ntp on a Linux-based box for accurate ti