Re: [ntp:questions] NTP does not reply to IP addresses that start with 69

Danny Mayer wrote: > Martin Burnicki wrote: > >>Danny, >> >>Danny Mayer wrote: >> >>>Ronan Flood wrote: >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Danny Mayer) wrote: >4.1.0 was a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away. "The code is out there." >>> >>>That doesn't matter. We only supp

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP does not reply to IP addresses that start with 69

Martin Burnicki wrote: > Danny, > > Danny Mayer wrote: >> Ronan Flood wrote: >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Danny Mayer) wrote: >>> 4.1.0 was a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away. >>> "The code is out there." >>> >> That doesn't matter. We only support the current current unless there's >> a pai

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP does not reply to IP addresses that start with 69

Martin Burnicki wrote: [] > I don't think I've read a request where this should be fixed in an > older version. > > The problem in this NG seems to be that some insiders seem to assume > all users are running a very recent version of NTP, and I'm pretty > sure this is not the case. > > I think most

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP does not reply to IP addresses that start with 69

Danny, Danny Mayer wrote: > Ronan Flood wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Danny Mayer) wrote: >> >>> 4.1.0 was a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away. >> >> "The code is out there." >> > > That doesn't matter. We only support the current current unless there's > a paid contract to maintain some

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP does not reply to IP addresses that start with 69

Ronan Flood wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Danny Mayer) wrote: > >> 4.1.0 was a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away. > > "The code is out there." > That doesn't matter. We only support the current current unless there's a paid contract to maintain some other version. Dave was concerned about

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP does not reply to IP addresses that start with 69

On 2008-04-03, Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I now know I have to update. So what is the last stable version? The current stable release is 4.2.4p4 2007/09/10 Current version information is published at: http://www.ntp.org/ http://support.ntp.org/ http://support.ntp.org/rss/releases.xml (as

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP does not reply to IP addresses that start with 69

Ray wrote: > Thanks to everyone who replied. > I now know I have to update. So what is the last stable version? > > I just wanted to know how the daemon could be so selective to deny IP > 69.x.x.x > > Ray It depends on what's in your config file. You may be restricting 69/8 addresses. Danny __

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP does not reply to IP addresses that start with 69

Thanks to everyone who replied. I now know I have to update. So what is the last stable version? I just wanted to know how the daemon could be so selective to deny IP 69.x.x.x Ray -- "Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Harlan, >

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP does not reply to IP addresses that start with 69

Ronan, You are right. The oldest version I have here is 4.1.2 circa July 2003 and the port check had been removed. Also, my warning to not change ntp_proto.c without my permission was not in that version. So, nobody did anything wrong, just misguided. I just don't want somthing to leave here n

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP does not reply to IP addresses that start with 69

On 2008-04-02, Ronan Flood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Danny Mayer) wrote: > >> 4.1.0 was a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away. > > "The code is out there." That NTP_PORT test appears to be present in ntp-4.1.0 but not in ntp-4.1.1. So it was obviously removed after it wa

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP does not reply to IP addresses that start with 69

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Danny Mayer) writes: >Dave, >4.1.0 was a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away. We don't care about >that version any more. Anyone who wants help needs to upgrade to a more >recent version. IF you knoww that this was a bug in a particular old version and that the new versi

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP does not reply to IP addresses that start with 69

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Danny Mayer) wrote: > 4.1.0 was a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away. "The code is out there." -- Ronan Flood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questi

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP does not reply to IP addresses that start with 69

On 2008-04-02, David L. Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was afraid this might happen. There is no such port check in the > development branch, so somebody broke my rules not to change ntp_proto.c > withhout my permission. The result not only breaks the specification, it > disables symmetri

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP does not reply to IP addresses that start with 69

Dave, 4.1.0 was a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away. We don't care about that version any more. Anyone who wants help needs to upgrade to a more recent version. Danny David L. Mills wrote: > Guys, > > I was afraid this might happen. There is no such port check in the > development bran

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP does not reply to IP addresses that start with 69

"David L. Mills" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was afraid this might happen. There is no such port check in the > development branch Relax, Dave: the original poster is running old code, version 4.1.0. This port check was removed in 2002. -- Ronan Flood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP does not reply to IP addresses that start with 69

Guys, I was afraid this might happen. There is no such port check in the development branch, so somebody broke my rules not to change ntp_proto.c withhout my permission. The result not only breaks the specification, it disables symmetric active/active modes. Any check like this has to be mode

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP does not reply to IP addresses that start with 69

On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 12:44:17 -0400, "Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > input_handler: if=2 fd=6 length 48 from 453fdb02 69.63.219.2 > receive: at 38 132.246.168.2<-69.63.219.2 restrict 00 > receive: at 182 132.246.168.2<-69.156.105.192 restrict 00 > receive: at 182 132.246.168.2<-69.156.105.192 mo

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP does not reply to IP addresses that start with 69

How do you know that the problem is specific to systems that have addresses that begin with 69? If you take the failing system in this debug and change nothing else but it's IP address, does it work okay? Do you have more than one system that is having this problem and they are all on the 69.*.

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP does not reply to IP addresses that start with 69

Ray, I don't know if Danny has any ideas, but I think we may need a higher level of debugging. -- Harlan Stenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://ntpforum.isc.org - be a member! ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP does not reply to IP addresses that start with 69

Harlan, Here are sample of the debug output, which include IP addresses that start with 69. This first sample gave no reply. I assume it is version 3. --- MCAST *sendpkt(fd=6 dst=192.70.172.132, src=132.246.168.2

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP does not reply to IP addresses that start with 69

Ray, >>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ray> I am running stratum-1 servers with NTP version 4.1.0. There are no Ray> restrictions in the NTP configuration and no restrictions in the Ray> firewall. Yet, when I receive NTP request, from version3, and with an Ray

[ntp:questions] NTP does not reply to IP addresses that start with 69

I am running stratum-1 servers with NTP version 4.1.0. There are no restrictions in the NTP configuration and no restrictions in the firewall. Yet, when I receive NTP request, from version3, and with an IP address starting with 69, the daemon does not reply to it. The server will reply to NTP pac