On 2013-08-15, unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
On 2013-08-14, Steve Kostecke koste...@ntp.org wrote:
The time server specified in each of those lines is the one which is
currently selected as the sys_peer.
But as I understand it, it is simply one of the systems which is
not a false ticker,
On 2013-08-15, Steve Kostecke koste...@ntp.org wrote:
On 2013-08-15, unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
On 2013-08-14, Steve Kostecke koste...@ntp.org wrote:
The time server specified in each of those lines is the one which is
currently selected as the sys_peer.
But as I understand it, it is
On 14/08/13 16:03, Nils Brubaker wrote:
all of whose error intervals overlap and uses the average of those times
as the time to send on the the ntp engine. The others are false
tickers. It estimates the error by looking at the round trip time and
the other machine's estimate of its own max
On 2013-08-15, unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
On 2013-08-15, Steve Kostecke koste...@ntp.org wrote:
[---=| Quote block shrinked by t-prot: 42 lines snipped |=---]
The mitigation algorithm proceeds in three steps in turn.
1. If there are no survivors, the modem driver becomes the only
For ntpd 4.2.4p6 running on Linux, is there any significance to the order
of servers in the ntp.conf file? Will ntpd synchronize with the first
available/good time server in the list?
Thanks,
Nils Brubaker
___
questions mailing list
On 2013-08-13, Nils Brubaker n...@us.ibm.com wrote:
For ntpd 4.2.4p6 running on Linux, is there any significance to the order
of servers in the ntp.conf file? Will ntpd synchronize with the first
available/good time server in the list?
No, no.
ntp gets the data from all the servers. It then
Thank you, un...@invalid.ca, for your response to my question.
Couple follow-up questions. My ntp.conf running on Linux has 4 servers
defined:
server 0.rhel.pool.ntp.org
server 1.rhel.pool.ntp.org
server 2.rhel.pool.ntp.org
These are public servers from the NTP pool project. In my
On 13/08/2013 20:52, Nils Brubaker wrote:
For ntpd 4.2.4p6 running on Linux, is there any significance to the order
of servers in the ntp.conf file? Will ntpd synchronize with the first
available/good time server in the list?
Thanks,
Nils Brubaker
The order you list likely determines the
I don't understand how you get the idea that your system is
synchronizing with only one server when the messages you posted show it
synchronizing with 6 servers. Do you mean that it is synchronizing with
one server at a time? That is what it is supposed to do. There is a
combining step in the
On 2013-08-14, Nils Brubaker n...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Thank you, un...@invalid.ca, for your response to my question.
Couple follow-up questions. My ntp.conf running on Linux has 4 servers
defined:
server 0.rhel.pool.ntp.org
server 1.rhel.pool.ntp.org
server 2.rhel.pool.ntp.org
These are
On 2013-08-14, unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
On 2013-08-14, Nils Brubaker n...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Aug 8 15:01:00 yellowstone ntpd[3254]: synchronized to 50.116.55.161,
stratum 2
Aug 8 16:09:20 yellowstone ntpd[3254]: synchronized to 38.101.77.21,
stratum 2
These log messages suggest
11 matches
Mail list logo
