On Mar 9, 11:43 am, David Lord wrote:
> Alby VA wrote:
> > On Mar 8, 6:43 am, David Lord wrote:
> >> Alby VA wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >> David
> > Does this mean there is something I need to tweek to get
> > my offsets lower? Could the delays from the remote NTP
> > servers be my i
On Mar 9, 11:43 am, David Lord wrote:
> Alby VA wrote:
> > On Mar 8, 6:43 am, David Lord wrote:
> >> Alby VA wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >> David
> > Does this mean there is something I need to tweek to get
> > my offsets lower? Could the delays from the remote NTP
> > servers be my i
Alby VA wrote:
On Mar 8, 6:43 am, David Lord wrote:
Alby VA wrote:
David
Does this mean there is something I need to tweek to get
my offsets lower? Could the delays from the remote NTP
servers be my issue?
I don't know if that's the case. I setup my two servers
to use the nea
Alby VA wrote:
On Mar 8, 6:43 am, David Lord wrote:
Alby VA wrote:
David
Does this mean there is something I need to tweek to get
my offsets lower? Could the delays from the remote NTP
servers be my issue?
I don't know if that's the case. I setup my two servers
to use the nea
On Mar 8, 6:43 am, David Lord wrote:
> Alby VA wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> David
> >>> Does this mean there is something I need to tweek to get
> >>> my offsets lower? Could the delays from the remote NTP
> >>> servers be my issue?
> >> I don't know if that's the case. I setup my two
On Mar 8, 6:43 am, David Lord wrote:
> Alby VA wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> David
> >>> Does this mean there is something I need to tweek to get
> >>> my offsets lower? Could the delays from the remote NTP
> >>> servers be my issue?
> >> I don't know if that's the case. I setup my two
Ron Frazier (NTP) wrote:
> It occurred to me that BSD (which I know nothing
> about, but am assuming it's a linux like system)
Its the other way around, Linux is Unix-like;
Unix in general predates Linux but something like 22 years;
BSD predates Linux, by something like 14 years.
--
E-Mail Se
On 2012-03-08, Ron Frazier (NTP) wrote:
> On 3/7/2012 7:10 PM, David Lord wrote:
>> Ron Frazier (NTP) wrote:
>>> I'm a little confused. Are you currently getting offsets in the 10's
>>> of milliseconds range or in the 10's of microseconds range. Also,
>>> how are you measuring offset from UTC,
My system with Sure GPS and PPS :
identmeanrmsmax
127.127.22.20.000 0.004 0.030
The 30 usec offsets are during the morning at time the
system logs are created and rotated.
I'll try to insulate the xtal when I next have to move
the pc but I don't know that the blips in o
Ron Frazier (NTP) wrote:
On 3/7/2012 7:10 PM, David Lord wrote:
Ron Frazier (NTP) wrote:
I'm a little confused. Are you currently getting offsets in the 10's
of milliseconds range or in the 10's of microseconds range. Also,
how are you measuring offset from UTC, as opposed to offset from the
On 3/8/2012 6:54 AM, David Lord wrote:
Ron Frazier (NTP) wrote:
On 3/7/2012 11:59 AM, David Lord wrote:
Alby VA wrote:
On Mar 7, 10:59 am, David Lord wrote:
Alby VA wrote:
I'm looking to get a little feedback on if the following output
of my
Sure GPS / FreeBSD
setup looks like its running
Ron Frazier (NTP) wrote:
On 3/7/2012 11:59 AM, David Lord wrote:
Alby VA wrote:
On Mar 7, 10:59 am, David Lord wrote:
Alby VA wrote:
I'm looking to get a little feedback on if the following output of my
Sure GPS / FreeBSD
setup looks like its running smoothly and keeping time correctly.
ass
Alby VA wrote:
David
Does this mean there is something I need to tweek to get
my offsets lower? Could the delays from the remote NTP
servers be my issue?
I don't know if that's the case. I setup my two servers
to use the nearest ntp servers that didn't share the same
sources. There are
"Ron Frazier (NTP)" wrote in message
news:4f582243.10...@c3energy.com...
[]
At first I was confused and thought he was ms off. However, if he's
within 34 us, that's pretty good. Sounds like his board is working OK,
but could possibly be a bit better. If he were communicating
exclusively on
On 3/7/2012 11:59 AM, David Lord wrote:
Alby VA wrote:
On Mar 7, 10:59 am, David Lord wrote:
Alby VA wrote:
I'm looking to get a little feedback on if the following output of my
Sure GPS / FreeBSD
setup looks like its running smoothly and keeping time correctly.
assID=0 status=0115 leap_none
On 3/7/2012 7:10 PM, David Lord wrote:
Ron Frazier (NTP) wrote:
I'm a little confused. Are you currently getting offsets in the 10's
of milliseconds range or in the 10's of microseconds range. Also,
how are you measuring offset from UTC, as opposed to offset from the
GPS board?
Sincerely,
On Mar 7, 3:51 pm, David Lord wrote:
> Alby VA wrote:
> > On Mar 7, 11:59 am, David Lord wrote:
> >> Alby VA wrote:
> >>> On Mar 7, 10:59 am, David Lord wrote:
> Alby VA wrote:
> > I'm looking to get a little feedback on if the following output of my
> > Sure GPS / FreeBSD
> >
Ron Frazier (NTP) wrote:
I'm a little confused. Are you currently getting offsets in the 10's of
milliseconds range or in the 10's of microseconds range. Also, how are
you measuring offset from UTC, as opposed to offset from the GPS board?
Sincerely,
Ron
On 3/7/2012 7:26 AM, Alby VA wrote
Alby VA wrote:
On Mar 7, 11:59 am, David Lord wrote:
Alby VA wrote:
On Mar 7, 10:59 am, David Lord wrote:
Alby VA wrote:
I'm looking to get a little feedback on if the following output of my
Sure GPS / FreeBSD
setup looks like its running smoothly and keeping time correctly.
assID=0 status
I'm a little confused. Are you currently getting offsets in the 10's of
milliseconds range or in the 10's of microseconds range. Also, how are
you measuring offset from UTC, as opposed to offset from the GPS board?
Sincerely,
Ron
On 3/7/2012 7:26 AM, Alby VA wrote:
I'm looking to get a
> Does this mean there is something I need to tweek to get
> my offsets lower? Could the delays from the remote NTP
> servers be my issue?
There is almost certainly some delay from the time the signal hits the
antenna to the time the pulse hits pin-1 on the computer's serial
port. If you can me
On Mar 7, 11:59 am, David Lord wrote:
> Alby VA wrote:
> > On Mar 7, 10:59 am, David Lord wrote:
> >> Alby VA wrote:
> >>> I'm looking to get a little feedback on if the following output of my
> >>> Sure GPS / FreeBSD
> >>> setup looks like its running smoothly and keeping time correctly.
> >>>
Alby VA wrote:
On Mar 7, 10:59 am, David Lord wrote:
Alby VA wrote:
I'm looking to get a little feedback on if the following output of my
Sure GPS / FreeBSD
setup looks like its running smoothly and keeping time correctly.
assID=0 status=0115 leap_none, sync_atomic, 1 event,
event_clock_reset
On 3/7/2012 11:15 AM, Alby VA wrote:
Here is my ntpq -p output:
[a...@godzilla.empire.org(tcsh):6] ntpq -p
remote refid st t when poll reach delay
offset jitter
==
-ntp.alaska.edu .GPS.
"Alby VA" wrote in message
news:fd63494a-4a9a-47d1-b640-fe2578b05...@hs8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...
[]
You might be right. It could be mislabeled. I pretty much did a Cut-
Paste from some website for my MRTG setup. Here is what I have listed.
#ntpstat.pl
#GetNTP3000usec.pl
"some Web si
On Mar 7, 10:59 am, David Lord wrote:
> Alby VA wrote:
> > I'm looking to get a little feedback on if the following output of my
> > Sure GPS / FreeBSD
> > setup looks like its running smoothly and keeping time correctly.
>
> > assID=0 status=0115 leap_none, sync_atomic, 1 event,
> > event_clock_
On Mar 7, 10:46 am, Chris Albertson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 4:26 AM, Alby VA wrote:
>
> > I'm looking to get a little feedback on if the following output of my
> > Sure GPS / FreeBSD
> > setup looks like its running smoothly and keeping time correctly.
>
> The graphs say your system is r
On Mar 7, 9:50 am, "David J Taylor" wrote:
> "Alby VA" wrote in message
>
> news:d2d5cf76-b61e-4e58-800b-a1c27a63d...@hs8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > I'm looking to get a little feedback on if the following output of my
> > Sure GPS / FreeBSD
> > setup looks like its run
Alby VA wrote:
I'm looking to get a little feedback on if the following output of my
Sure GPS / FreeBSD
setup looks like its running smoothly and keeping time correctly.
assID=0 status=0115 leap_none, sync_atomic, 1 event,
event_clock_reset,
version="ntpd 4.2.6p5@1.2349-o Mon Feb 20 22:00:33 U
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 4:26 AM, Alby VA wrote:
>
> I'm looking to get a little feedback on if the following output of my
> Sure GPS / FreeBSD
> setup looks like its running smoothly and keeping time correctly.
The graphs say your system is running "well enough" for most purposes
but a BSD syste
"Alby VA" wrote in message
news:d2d5cf76-b61e-4e58-800b-a1c27a63d...@hs8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...
I'm looking to get a little feedback on if the following output of my
Sure GPS / FreeBSD
setup looks like its running smoothly and keeping time correctly.
assID=0 status=0115 leap_none, sync_a
I'm looking to get a little feedback on if the following output of my
Sure GPS / FreeBSD
setup looks like its running smoothly and keeping time correctly.
assID=0 status=0115 leap_none, sync_atomic, 1 event,
event_clock_reset,
version="ntpd 4.2.6p5@1.2349-o Mon Feb 20 22:00:33 UTC 2012 (1)",
pr
32 matches
Mail list logo
