I have NTP server running on two Red Hat boxes. Each box has a primary
address on eth0, and share a virtual IP address that is managed by linux-ha
heartbeat.
NTP requests sent to the virtual IP address are responded to by the primary
address of eth0 on the server that is handling requests at the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have NTP server running on two Red Hat boxes. Each box has a primary
> address on eth0, and share a virtual IP address that is managed by linux-ha
> heartbeat.
>
> NTP requests sent to the virtual IP address are responded to by the primary
> address of eth0 on the ser
Danny Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The general answer is no. It binds to all addresses but use of the
> -L option will mean that it ignores anything not received on :0
> interfaces which is what I think you are saying. An enhancement that
> I have worked on will allow you to specify the addre
Rick Jones wrote:
> Danny Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The general answer is no. It binds to all addresses but use of the
>> -L option will mean that it ignores anything not received on :0
>> interfaces which is what I think you are saying. An enhancement that
>> I have worked on will allow
Danny Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rick Jones wrote:
> > If it simply sends via the socket on which the query was recieved,
> > having bound that socket to a given IP should result in that IP being
> > used as the source IP of the response.
> >
> > Perhaps there is a reason to send via anoth
