[ntp:questions] Under which circumstances a reply comes 126 seconds later?

I picked up this packet: Client, Leap indicator: (0), Stratum 2, poll 7s, precision -19 Root Delay: 0.008636, Root dispersion: 0.008285, Reference-ID: 192.87.106.3 Reference Timestamp: 3413695597.398913090 (2008/03/05 09:46:37) Originator Timestamp:

Re: [ntp:questions] Under which circumstances a reply comes 126 seconds later?

Danny Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef in bericht news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Jos van de Ven wrote: I picked up this packet: Client, Leap indicator: (0), Stratum 2, poll 7s, precision -19 Root Delay: 0.008636, Root dispersion: 0.008285, Reference-ID: 192.87.106.3 Reference

Re: [ntp:questions] Under which circumstances a reply comes 126 seconds later?

Danny Mayer wrote: NTP never delays sending replies unless something is preventing it from running. I have never heard of a limited option in ntp.conf. What version of ntp are you running, on what platform, what does your ntp.conf look like and what else could be prempting ntp? Danny

Re: [ntp:questions] Under which circumstances a reply comes 126 seconds later?

Brian, How true. But, are you ready for this? The minimum average headway constraint, introduced to protect very busy servers, must be at least 16 s by default, but allow for a temporaty 8-packet burst. So, if somebody configures a symmetric active association with iburst and autokey and