On 6/18/2014 2:08 PM, Harlan Stenn wrote:
> Others have made good points, and I'll just add that DNSSEC requires
> "good time".
Irrespective of DNSSEC you should be running NTP on all such servers
regardless of DNSSEC, TSIG, etc., especially so that your logs are
accurate. Whether or not to allow
kartik.u...@gmail.com wrote:
> Please let me know your thoughts on the above statement.
> I am encouraging the use of atomic time NTP server devices rather than DNS
> servers to serve time.
> I need to justify, not using DNS servers, to serve time. Please advise.
_Your_ DNS servers can certainly
Others have made good points, and I'll just add that DNSSEC requires
"good time".
--
Harlan Stenn
http://networktimefoundation.org - be a member!
___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
On 2014-06-18, kartik.u...@gmail.com wrote:
> Please let me know your thoughts on the above statement.
>
> I am encouraging the use of atomic time NTP server devices rather than DNS
> servers to serve time.
>
> I need to justify, not using DNS servers, to serve time. Please advise.
What are your
On -10.01.-28163 20:59, kartik.u...@gmail.com wrote:
> I am encouraging the use of atomic time NTP server devices rather than
> DNS servers to serve time.
>
> I need to justify, not using DNS servers, to serve time. Please advise.
Well the *obvious* argument would be that you want your DNS server
Hi,
Generalizations such as that have practically no meaning. All I can say is IT
DEPENDS. You need to know more about the servers in question.
You need to ask:
Where will the DNS servers get their time?
Are the DNS servers heavily loaded, even intermittently?
What qual
Please let me know your thoughts on the above statement.
I am encouraging the use of atomic time NTP server devices rather than DNS
servers to serve time.
I need to justify, not using DNS servers, to serve time. Please advise.
___
questions mailing li
