@lists.ntp.org
Subject: Re: [ntp:questions] authenticated packet using alternate digest
algorithms
External E-Mail
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 04:08:47PM +, greg.d...@microchip.com wrote:
> However, in operation things get weird. Md5 and sha1 are fine. Ripemd160 is
> successful but I
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 04:08:47PM +, greg.d...@microchip.com wrote:
> However, in operation things get weird. Md5 and sha1 are fine. Ripemd160 is
> successful but I think that is just lucky because it has a 160bit digest that
> ends up looking like a sha1 mac. However, I "think" because
Sorry, took me a few tries to get a format that was acceptable for posting and
lost quite a bit of the original material in the process.
Hey, am I missing something here? I'm looking at ntpd 4.2.6 and 4.2.8. A
customer pointed to the ntp.keys web page and asked about using sha512. The
link
