Apology accepted.
"Richard B. Gilbert" wrote in message
news:uoodnstftiif5gnnnz2dnuvz_rwdn...@giganews.com...
On 1/14/2013 3:18 PM, E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the
BlackLists wrote:
Edward T. Mischanko wrote:
Does Richard B. Gilbert have nothing better to say,
than to pos
On 1/14/2013 3:18 PM, E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the
BlackLists wrote:
Edward T. Mischanko wrote:
Does Richard B. Gilbert have nothing better to say,
than to post the same reply 5 times,
I think it is very likely that his news or mail, client or service
is having issues.
Edward T. Mischanko wrote:
> Does Richard B. Gilbert have nothing better to say,
> than to post the same reply 5 times,
I think it is very likely that his news or mail, client or service
is having issues.
--
E-Mail Sent to this address
will be added to the BlackLists.
_
Does Richard B. Gilbert have nothing better to say, than to post the same
reply 5 times, and not deal with the question at hand? And Unruh, let’s
grow-up and reply to posts in clear, COMPLETE, thoughts that truly answer
the question.
Regardless,
Ed
"Richard B. Gilbert" wrote in message
On 1/9/2013 7:09 PM, unruh wrote:
On 2013-01-09, thelastroman...@live.fr wrote:
Hi,
Thanks, it seems to work.
So, i just need nanoseconds precision with this 1pps on my localhost,
don't need NTP or other.
You will NOT get nanosecond precision. If that is your goal, give up
now. No computer
On 1/9/2013 7:09 PM, unruh wrote:
On 2013-01-09, thelastroman...@live.fr wrote:
Hi,
Thanks, it seems to work.
So, i just need nanoseconds precision with this 1pps on my localhost,
don't need NTP or other.
You will NOT get nanosecond precision. If that is your goal, give up
now. No computer
On 1/9/2013 7:09 PM, unruh wrote:
On 2013-01-09, thelastroman...@live.fr wrote:
Hi,
Thanks, it seems to work.
So, i just need nanoseconds precision with this 1pps on my localhost,
don't need NTP or other.
You will NOT get nanosecond precision. If that is your goal, give up
now. No computer
On 1/9/2013 7:09 PM, unruh wrote:
On 2013-01-09, thelastroman...@live.fr wrote:
Hi,
Thanks, it seems to work.
So, i just need nanoseconds precision with this 1pps on my localhost,
don't need NTP or other.
You will NOT get nanosecond precision. If that is your goal, give up
now. No computer
On 1/9/2013 7:09 PM, unruh wrote:
On 2013-01-09, thelastroman...@live.fr wrote:
Hi,
Thanks, it seems to work.
So, i just need nanoseconds precision with this 1pps on my localhost,
don't need NTP or other.
You will NOT get nanosecond precision. If that is your goal, give up
now. No computer
On 2013-01-09, thelastroman...@live.fr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks, it seems to work.
>
> So, i just need nanoseconds precision with this 1pps on my localhost,
> don't need NTP or other.
You will NOT get nanosecond precision. If that is your goal, give up
now. No computer can reach that. a)the time s
Hi,
Thanks, it seems to work.
So, i just need nanoseconds precision with this 1pps on my localhost,
don't need NTP or other.
I've have compiled succefully compiled my program with timepps.h,
and i want to create a nanoseconds chronometer between each 1PPS.
What function should i use from timepps
11 matches
Mail list logo