On Thu, Nov 4, 2021, at 09:54, Lucas Pardue wrote:
> * Disagreement in handling of unknown unidirectional stream types #4929
> - the proposed resolution is https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4942
> * Clarify client behavior on receiving 421 #4934
> - the proposed resolution is to close
Hello WG,
We've had a few issues pop up on the HTTP/3 and QPACK specifications while
we've been waiting in the RFC editor queue. Like last time, our responsible
AD has asked us to run a consensus call to ensure that the WG is happy with
the proposed changes, before incorporating them into the docu
Reposted here (with permission) since I think it's important to get this on
the record for discussion on this list. It's always interesting to read about
protocol implementation details, especially if others can learn from them.
Peter.
-- Snip --
Please change your mind about your announced rel
* I'm wondering if you could give a bit more details about the expected
outcome of this meeting?
I have no plan, let’s see what the community thinks. (And this is not just me,
this started with some people reaching out to me.) Here are some potential
outcomes in my view:
* People get a
Hello Rich,
I'm wondering if you could give a bit more details about the expected
outcome of this meeting?
IIUC, most people in the QUIC wg at least seem to be of the same opinion
that the OpenSSL plans are bad; I'm not sure IETF people (and even most
other QUIC implementers/users) need (more) co
