gt; inflight_bytes? Though that could be confused with byte_in_flight?
>
> Ian
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 2:09 AM Timo Völker
> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The pseudo code in the recovery draft uses the function
> DetectAndRemoveAckedPackets. Is my assumption correct th
the way it's used, maybe it makes sense to rename sent_bytes to
>>> inflight_bytes? Though that could be confused with byte_in_flight?
>>>
>>> Ian
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 2:09 AM Timo Völker
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> H
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 2:09 AM Timo Völker
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The pseudo code in the recovery draft uses the function
>> DetectAndRemoveAckedPackets. Is my assumption correct that this function
>> should return a list of all newly acked packets (i
Hi all,
The pseudo code in the recovery draft uses the function
DetectAndRemoveAckedPackets. Is my assumption correct that this function should
return a list of all newly acked packets (including these that do not count as
in flight)?
If so, it seems there is a bug in the code, because this
