On Sat, 27 Aug 2005, Ricardo Luiz Andrade Abrantes wrote:
> Hi!
> Yes, I am returning a SEXP from the functions called from R, and the
> problem occurs before (thousands of iterations before) the return
> point.
> In fact I runned valgrind into R and when I call ".Call(...) " I got
> many errors l
Hi!
Yes, I am returning a SEXP from the functions called from R, and the
problem occurs before (thousands of iterations before) the return
point.
In fact I runned valgrind into R and when I call ".Call(...) " I got
many errors like:
==4324== Use of uninitialised value of size 8
==4324==at 0x1CB
This may not be entirely on the mark in terms of relevancy but
just in case there is some relevancy I wanted to bring it up.
Just to be concrete, suppose one wants to run the following as
a concurrent process to R. (What is does is it implicitly sets x
to zero and then for each line of stdin it
Martin Maechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the mean time, I think it has become clear that
> "loopconnection" isn't necessarily a better name, and that
> textConnection() has been there in "the S litterature" for a
> good reason and for quite a while.
> Let's forget about the naming and the e
On Sat, 27 Aug 2005, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Check your versions of MASS. The Windows one appears to be an outdated
>> version, and does different things.
>
> Forgetting to run tools/rsync-recommended during build will do that
> sort of thing to
Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Check your versions of MASS. The Windows one appears to be an outdated
> version, and does different things.
Forgetting to run tools/rsync-recommended during build will do that
sort of thing to you, but it would seem that Berwin used a binary
down
Check your versions of MASS. The Windows one appears to be an outdated
version, and does different things.
As for the problem, yes it probably is a bug in L-BFGS-B. Fancy debugging
the code?
On Sat, 27 Aug 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> --WWm7B+u2U4
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-
On Sat, 27 Aug 2005, Berwin A Turlach wrote:
> G'day all,
>
> After reading through "Writing R Extensions", Version 2.1.1
> (2005-06-20), I thought the the following points might need
> clarifications or corrections. (I checked that these comments also
> hold for "Writing R Extensions", Version 2
--WWm7B+u2U4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Description: message body text
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
G'day all,
I believe that this is related to PR#1717 (filed under
not-reproducible) which was reported for a version of R that is a
quite a bit older than the ones used
On Sat, 27 Aug 2005, Berwin A Turlach wrote:
> G'day all,
>
> After reading through "Writing R Extensions", Version 2.1.1
> (2005-06-20), I thought the the following points might need
> clarifications or corrections. (I checked that these comments also
> hold for "Writing R Extensions", Version 2
G'day all,
After reading through "Writing R Extensions", Version 2.1.1
(2005-06-20), I thought the the following points might need
clarifications or corrections. (I checked that these comments also
hold for "Writing R Extensions", Version 2.2.0.)
1) When I ran "package.skeleton" recently, I noti
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005, James Bullard wrote:
> Hello all, I am writing an R interface to some C++ files which make use
> of std::wstring classes for internationalization. Previously (when I
> wanted to make R strings from C++ std::strings), I would do something
> like this to construct a string in R
And... hopefully my final admission that I did not do my background
research; the system I'm working with and borrowed from a colleague
(since my own is on service) is not a Windows XP Pro _SP2_, but
apparently _SP1_. It's not worth troubleshooting much until I get an
update here. Thank you B
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Aug 2005, Uwe Ligges wrote:
>
>> Thomas Lumley wrote:
>>
>>> I can't reproduce this on R2.2.0dev on Windows XP (in a few hundred
>>> tries), or running under Valgrind on AMD64 Linux (in four or five
>>> tries).
>>
>>
>> Cannot reproduce either (using R-2.1.1
> "David" == David Hinds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Mon, 22 Aug 2005 23:34:15 + (UTC) writes:
David> I've just implemented a generalization of R's text connections, to
David> also support reading/writing raw binary data. There is very little
David> new code to speak of.
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 09:23:37AM +0100, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>
> >"loop" is short for "loopback". A loop or loopback device is one that
> >just returns the data sent to it.
>
> That is definitely not what text connections do, and not what I read the
> proposal as being given the analogies
Thank you Thomas and Uwe for this.
This is really odd, because today I can neither reproduce it myself (I
rebooted my computer this morning). I try to recall what I did
yesterday: I did _not_ reboot my machine, but I did install the latest
binaries of R 2.1.1 and 2.2.0dev from CRAN. I did cl
On Sat, 27 Aug 2005, Uwe Ligges wrote:
> Thomas Lumley wrote:
>> I can't reproduce this on R2.2.0dev on Windows XP (in a few hundred
>> tries), or running under Valgrind on AMD64 Linux (in four or five tries).
>
> Cannot reproduce either (using R-2.1.1 and an older version of R-devel,
> though). M
Thomas Lumley wrote:
> I can't reproduce this on R2.2.0dev on Windows XP (in a few hundred
> tries), or running under Valgrind on AMD64 Linux (in four or five tries).
Cannot reproduce either (using R-2.1.1 and an older version of R-devel,
though). Maybe a compiler issue?
Henrik, do you use exact
On Sat, 27 Aug 2005, Ales Ziberna wrote:
> Thank you for your reply!
>
> I know I can use g77 with -ffree-form. However, I do not know how to make a
> package so that when others would build a package, these subrutines would
> compile with "-ffree-form". I heard of "makevars" and flags, however I
Thank you for your reply!
I know I can use g77 with -ffree-form. However, I do not know how to make a
package so that when others would build a package, these subrutines would
compile with "-ffree-form". I heard of "makevars" and flags, however I read
on the mailing list archives that they are
On Sat, 27 Aug 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Gabor Grothendieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> OK. I guess you want one of the core people to respond but in the
One has.
>> interim can you explain the terminology "loop"?
>> Also, do you have any prototypical applications in mind?
>
> "loop" is
22 matches
Mail list logo
