Re: [Rd] FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT and R-2.2.0 alpha

2005-09-24 Thread Rainer Hurling
Sorry for my very late answer. On Sept. 12th I got an unexpected business trip until yesterday evening, so I had no chance to try out. Thank you for the hints. But I am afraid I have no idea how to extract the needed information. With R-2.2.0 (R-beta_2005-09-22_r35658.tar.gz) I tried the follo

[Rd] plot, spineplot, boxplot in R 2.2.0

2005-09-24 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
I noticed, what seened to me, to be odd. These produce a boxplot in the first case and a spineplot in the second case in R .2.2.0: plot(Sepal.Length ~ Species, iris) plot(Species ~ Sepal.Length, iris) What if one wants to exchange axes? Does the fact that this seemingly innocuous change result

[Rd] complex.h in R

2005-09-24 Thread Jennifer Lai
Hi, How does complex.h used in R? Whether a compiler support complex.h or not, does it affect R's performance? I used PGI compiler to build R-devel on AMD Opteron, but the configuration file failed to link BLAS library despite the fact it is located in the usual location, /usr/lib64. PGI s

Re: [Rd] plot, spineplot, boxplot in R 2.2.0

2005-09-24 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
I agree that I was mixing up the two issues. On 9/24/05, John Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear Gabor, > > This behaviour makes sense to me, since in the first case the response is > quantitative and the explanatory variable a factor (hence, parallel > boxplots), while in the second it's vice-

Re: [Rd] plot, spineplot, boxplot in R 2.2.0

2005-09-24 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
On 9/24/05, Marc Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 2005-09-24 at 11:48 -0400, Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > > I noticed, what seened to me, to be odd. These produce > > a boxplot in the first case and a spineplot in the second > > case in R .2.2.0: > > > > plot(Sepal.Length ~ Species, ir

Re: [Rd] plot, spineplot, boxplot in R 2.2.0

2005-09-24 Thread John Fox
Dear Gabor, This behaviour makes sense to me, since in the first case the response is quantitative and the explanatory variable a factor (hence, parallel boxplots), while in the second it's vice-versa (hence parallel stacked bars). That is, the primary distinction, I think, isn't the orientation o

Re: [Rd] plot, spineplot, boxplot in R 2.2.0

2005-09-24 Thread Marc Schwartz
On Sat, 2005-09-24 at 12:00 -0500, Marc Schwartz wrote: > >From 2.0.0 beta ?plot.factor: Ack...That should be 2.2.0 beta. Sorry for the typo. Marc __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Re: [Rd] plot, spineplot, boxplot in R 2.2.0

2005-09-24 Thread Marc Schwartz
On Sat, 2005-09-24 at 11:48 -0400, Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > I noticed, what seened to me, to be odd. These produce > a boxplot in the first case and a spineplot in the second > case in R .2.2.0: > > plot(Sepal.Length ~ Species, iris) > plot(Species ~ Sepal.Length, iris) > > What if one wants

Re: [Rd] complex.h in R

2005-09-24 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Sat, 24 Sep 2005, Jennifer Lai wrote: > Hi, > How does complex.h used in R? Whether a compiler support complex.h > or not, does it affect R's performance? complex.h will only used in future (2.2.0-to-be) versions of R, and only if configure finds enough C99 support. Otherwise R's own C-lev