_=
__
Note: This e-mail is subject to the disclaimer contained at the bottom of=
=20this message.
_=
__
Just a note on the repo
In reading ?read.table I noticed what appears to be
a typo in the Details section. Below is a "patch"
which changes an "is" to an "if".
--- read.table.Rd Thu Aug 25 10:48:06 2005
+++ read.table2.Rd Sun Oct 30 16:42:01 2005
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@
}
\details{
A field or line is \sQuot
Thomas Lumley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, Jonathan Rougier wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure about this. Perhaps I am a dinosaur, but my feeling is
> > that if people are writing functions in R that might be subject to
> > simple operations like outer products, then they ought to
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, Jonathan Rougier wrote:
> I'm not sure about this. Perhaps I am a dinosaur, but my feeling is
> that if people are writing functions in R that might be subject to
> simple operations like outer products, then they ought to be writing
> vectorised functions!
I would agree. H
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Full_Name: foo ba baz
> Version: R2.2.0
> OS: Mac OS X (10.4)
> Submission from: (NULL) (219.66.32.183)
>
>
> chisq.test(matrix(c(9,10,9,11),2,2))
>
> Chi-square value must be 0, and, P value must be 0
> R does over correction
>
> when | a d - b c | < n / 2 ，chi-sq m
Full_Name: foo ba baz
Version: R2.2.0
OS: Mac OS X (10.4)
Submission from: (NULL) (219.66.32.183)
chisq.test(matrix(c(9,10,9,11),2,2))
Chi-square value must be 0, and, P value must be 0
R does over correction
when | a d - b c | < n / 2 ，chi-sq must be 0
I'm not sure about this. Perhaps I am a dinosaur, but my feeling is
that if people are writing functions in R that might be subject to
simple operations like outer products, then they ought to be writing
vectorised functions! Maybe it's not possible to hold this line, and
maybe "outer" is not
