Thank you. To avoid error messages on other platforms, we will use
#ifdef calloc
# undef calloc
#endif
(and similarly for free for completeness).
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, Ei-ji Nakama wrote:
> I build R-beta on AIX5.2 is failed.
>
> make[3]: Entering directory
> `/home/nakama/Rbeta/R-beta/src/nmat
I build R-beta on AIX5.2 is failed.
make[3]: Entering directory
`/home/nakama/Rbeta/R-beta/src/nmath'
xlc_r -I. -I../../src/include -I../../src/include -I/usr/local/include
-I/opt/freeware/include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -q64 -I/usr/local/include
-I/opt/freeware/include -O2 -D_ALL_SOURCE -D_LINUX_SOURCE
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 09:48:56PM +, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> Does anyone have a need to use f2c rather than a Fortran compiler to build
> R?
We used f2c up until a few months ago as a last line of defence against
crappy Fg77 code on m68k/arm (one or both, it changed at times).
I'd be hes
Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does anyone have a need to use f2c rather than a Fortran compiler to build
> R?
>
> It is yet one more thing to test, and as it only works on 32-bit platforms
> it is something that I will shortly no longer be able to test.
The only candidate th
Does anyone have a need to use f2c rather than a Fortran compiler to build
R?
It is yet one more thing to test, and as it only works on 32-bit platforms
it is something that I will shortly no longer be able to test.
--
Brian D. Ripley, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Professor of Applied St
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Fernando Henrique Ferraz P. da Rosa wrote:
>There seems to be a bug in the Startup section, regarding the
> R_PROFILE environment variable in Windows. If not a bug in the Startup
> itself, perhaps a bug in the documentation.
Nope, it works as documented, using exactly
?"[" says
See Also:
'list', 'array', 'matrix'.
'[.data.frame' and '[.factor' for the behaviour when applied to
data.frame and factors.
'Syntax' for operator precedence, and the _R Language_ reference
manual about indexing details.
and the `indexing details' are in
The other place its discussed is in 3.4.1 of the R Language Definition:
http://finzi.psych.upenn.edu/R/doc/manual/R-lang.html#Indexing-by-vectors
On 12/13/05, Tony Plate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, 0/1 (numeric) are intended to be used as index vectors -- and they
> have the semantics of nu
The other place its discussed is in 3.4.1 of the R Language Definition:
http://finzi.psych.upenn.edu/R/doc/manual/R-lang.html#Indexing-by-vectors
On 12/13/05, Tony Plate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, 0/1 (numeric) are intended to be used as index vectors -- and they
> have the semantics of nu
Dear R-devel,
There seems to be a bug in the Startup section, regarding the
R_PROFILE environment variable in Windows. If not a bug in the Startup
itself, perhaps a bug in the documentation.
According to ?Startup:
Then R searches for the site-wide startup profile unless
It is peculiar behaviour on your part, but the developers do not find it
at all `funny'.
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Full_Name: Axel Rasche
> Version: 2.2.0
> OS: Linux
> Submission from: (NULL) (141.14.21.81)
>
>
> Dear Debuggers,
>
> This is not a serious problem. Are 0/1 ve
Hi,
OK, no bug. I got stuck into to much indexing. Now I understand this
point definitely better.
Sorry for disturbing you,
Axel
Tony Plate wrote:
> Yes, 0/1 (numeric) are intended to be used as index vectors -- and they
> have the semantics of numeric indices, which is that 0 elements in the
Yes, 0/1 (numeric) are intended to be used as index vectors -- and they
have the semantics of numeric indices, which is that 0 elements in the
index are omitted from the result. This can be a very useful mode of
operation in many situations.
I was going to write "This is described in both the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Full_Name: Axel Rasche
> Version: 2.2.0
> OS: Linux
> Submission from: (NULL) (141.14.21.81)
>
>
> Dear Debuggers,
>
> This is not a serious problem. Are 0/1 vectors intended to be used as index
> vectors? If yes, there is a bug. If not, it leads just to some funny b
Full_Name: Axel Rasche
Version: 2.2.0
OS: Linux
Submission from: (NULL) (141.14.21.81)
Dear Debuggers,
This is not a serious problem. Are 0/1 vectors intended to be used as index
vectors? If yes, there is a bug. If not, it leads just to some funny behaviour
rather than an error message.
In the
> "Greg" == Gregory Warnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Mon, 12 Dec 2005 14:03:00 -0500 writes:
Greg> I got an email error message when I attempted to
Greg> send this from my work account. I have manually
Greg> added it to the bug tracker, and am resending from
Greg> my pe
16 matches
Mail list logo