'[' is the 'subscript' or 'extraction', not 'subscription' operator: this
is also called 'indexing', as in 'An Introduction to R'.
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
I was looking at the data frame subscription operator (attached in the end
of this e-mail) and got puzzled by the
Prof Brian Ripley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
type2char is itself a fairly recent addition (there is also type2str,
which is older) that I found useful for improving messages in R
itself.
I have not encountered such a need in package code, but the function
is exported.
This is not a request
Is Sahotra's abuse sending a wishlist item to R-bugs, or is his error
phrasing a suggestion in the form of a question? It seems others have
commented on the inability to specify df for chisq.test (see:
http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/help/05/01/10539.html), and adding an
option certainly seems
On Wednesday 08 November 2006 3:21 am, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
So far I was not able to figure out why this is necessary -
could anyone help ?
You need to remove the class to avoid recursion: a few lines later x[i]
needs to be a call to the primitive and not the data frame method.
I see.
Hi Folks,
I've been working on a 32bit build of R on Solaris 10 x64. What are the
steps for validate a build beyond make check? Once I am ready to
contribute a binary build / HowTo doc, who should I contact?
Thanks,
David
__
R-devel@r-project.org
.subset and .subset2 are equivalent to [ and [[ except that
dispatch does not take place. See ?.subset
On 11/8/06, Vladimir Dergachev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 08 November 2006 3:21 am, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
So far I was not able to figure out why this is necessary -
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Tai-Wei (David) Lin wrote:
Hi Folks,
I've been working on a 32bit build of R on Solaris 10 x64. What are the
steps for validate a build beyond make check?
make check-all is a more comprehensive test, including of the recommended
packages.
Once I am ready to contribute
The boxplot.default() function ignores argument 'boxfill' passed by user:
x - rnorm(100)
boxplot(x, boxfill=blue)
boxplot(x, pars=list(boxfill=green))
As the original creator of the 'boxfill' argument, I'd like to propose the
following change to the if(plot) clause in boxplot.R:
On Wednesday 08 November 2006 12:56 pm, Luke Tierney wrote:
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
Hi Luke,
I generally agree with this, however I believe that current logic breaks
down for large allocation sizes and my code ends up spending 70% (and up)
of computer time
On Nov 8, 2006, at 9:44 PM, Kasper Daniel Hansen wrote:
Upon further reflection on my part I have realized that my original
email was way too harsh - even for the sometimes harsh tone on R-
devel.
Having spent a few more minutes reflecting on the original question
and reading the old
10 matches
Mail list logo
