On 5/23/07, Prof Brian Ripley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
It really is the case that writing out a number to 15 significant digits
and reading it back in again is not required to give exactly the same
IEC60559 (sic) number, and furthermore there are R platforms for which
this does not
MartinMo == Martin Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Sat, 26 May 2007 21:44:27 -0700 writes:
MartinMo promptClass fails to identify methods associated
MartinMo with the class. Here is a fix:
Thank you, Martin;
I've applied your patch to my working copy of R-devel,
and I can confirm it
Full_Name: Edward McNeil
Version: 2.5.0
OS: Windows XP
Submission from: (NULL) (203.170.234.5)
This is a new bug introduced to R2.5.0.
Scenario: If one of the data frames to merge contains two variables that have
the same name, then the data in first variable (of the same name) is copied to
Full_Name: Ronald van Nooijen
Version: 1.4.1 and 1.5.0, evd 2.2-3
OS: windows xp
Submission from: (NULL) (130.161.12.43)
In an empty workspace first load package evd, then load package evir.
a call to any of the routines dgumberl, qgumbel etcetera will now result in an
error message of the form
On Mon, 21 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Full_Name: Edward McNeil
Version: 2.5.0
OS: Windows XP
Submission from: (NULL) (203.170.234.5)
This is a new bug introduced to R2.5.0.
Scenario: If one of the data frames to merge contains two variables that have
the same name, then the data
Please do not
- report on ancient versions of R.
- use R-bugs for reports on contributed packages.
It is hard to see why you think this is a bug, but you could ask the
authors of the two packages to work together to avoid this (or add
namespaces to protect the packages against this).
On Wed,
I am writing a package.
Please, study the sequence of my actions below, and comment, what's
incorrect.
The package contains pure R code.
1. At the one level up from the package directory, from the system command
prompt:
R CMD build --binary ac9
This produces the file ac9_0.1.zip (The package
Vladimir Eremeev wrote:
I am writing a package.
Please, study the sequence of my actions below, and comment, what's
incorrect.
The package contains pure R code.
1. At the one level up from the package directory, from the system command
prompt:
R CMD build --binary ac9
This produces
Yes, it appears to have been resolved in R2.5.0pat, although the
counter-example provided *does* fail in R2.5.0.
A - data.frame(x=1:3, y=4:6, y=7:9, check.names=FALSE)
B - data.frame(x=1:3, a=3:1)
A
x y y
1 1 4 7
2 2 5 8
3 3 6 9
B
x a
1 1 3
2 2 2
3 3 1
merge(A, B)
x y y.1 a
1 1 4 4 3
2 2
