GS == Gavin Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Fri, 01 Feb 2008 18:08:54 + writes:
GS On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 16:20 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GS wrote:
Full_Name: Anne CORI Version: 2.6.1 OS: windows
Submission from: (NULL) (134.157.220.19)
let A be a mtrix
Full_Name: Ben Hansen
Version: 2.6.1
OS: Windows
Submission from: (NULL) (66.93.3.101)
Hi,
In R 2.6.0 or 2.6.1 on Windows, I get the following upon opening the GUI (no
previous commands or special settings):
signif(digits=4, x=1/3)
[1] 4
It seems to be taking 4 to be the x argument, the
NO
Dear Ben,
If you take a look at the definition of signif() in R 2.6.1 and, e.g.,
in R 2.5.1 you'll see the source of the problem:
R 2.6.1:
signif
function (x, digits = 6) .Primitive(signif)
R 2.5.1:
signif
function (x, digits = 6)
.Internal(signif(x, digits))
environment:
Dear Ben,
If you take a look at the definition of signif() in R 2.6.1 and, e.g.,
in R 2.5.1 you'll see the source of the problem:
R 2.6.1:
signif
function (x, digits = 6) .Primitive(signif)
R 2.5.1:
signif
function (x, digits = 6)
.Internal(signif(x, digits))
environment: namespace:base
signif() is primitive in 2.6.x, and so uses positional matching (almost
all primitives do).
See the NEWS file for the announcement of the change.
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Full_Name: Ben Hansen
Version: 2.6.1
OS: Windows
Submission from: (NULL) (66.93.3.101)
Hi,
In
I am using gdb to debug a c++ library I made for R using Rcpp.
However, when I step through the code it seems to go all over the place, and
some of the variables have been optimized out so I can't see their values.
How can I compile without optimization?
Also, is there any neat way to run R with
