This is a low priority bug that has been around for a while, but I came acr=
oss it again while alpha testing 2.8.
The resulting function for splinefun gives incorrect deriv values when x is=
less than the smallest x-value used to create the function (at least in on=
e circumstance), but does the
On Oct 6, 2008, at 11:18 , Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 10/6/2008 11:00 AM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
On Oct 6, 2008, at 8:47 , Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 06/10/2008 8:06 AM, Thomas Petzoldt wrote:
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
Thomas Petzoldt wrote:
Dear R developers,
if one uses package.skeleton() to crea
On Mon, 6 Oct 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the latest R 2.8 alpha for Win32, if either of the commands are typed:
help("erfc")
.. or ..
?erfc
the result is:
No documentation for 'erfc' in specified packages and libraries:
you could try '??erfc'
This should be: 'help.search("erfc")', as
On 10/6/2008 11:00 AM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
On Oct 6, 2008, at 8:47 , Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 06/10/2008 8:06 AM, Thomas Petzoldt wrote:
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
Thomas Petzoldt wrote:
Dear R developers,
if one uses package.skeleton() to create a new package, then a
file anRpackage.Rd with
On Oct 6, 2008, at 8:47 , Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 06/10/2008 8:06 AM, Thomas Petzoldt wrote:
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
Thomas Petzoldt wrote:
Dear R developers,
if one uses package.skeleton() to create a new package, then a
file anRpackage.Rd with the following entries is prepared:
\name{a
In the latest R 2.8 alpha for Win32, if either of the commands are typed:
> help("erfc")
.. or ..
> ?erfc
the result is:
No documentation for 'erfc' in specified packages and libraries:
you could try '??erfc'
This should be: 'help.search("erfc")', as shown in R 2.7.2
Apologies if this has already
hadley wickham wrote:
It may not be much work for you, but I find any additional
requirements to the package format to be a real pain. I have ~10
packages on CRAN and having to go through and add this extra
information all at once is a big hassle. R releases tend to happen in
the middle of the
On 10/6/2008 9:55 AM, hadley wickham wrote:
It may not be much work for you, but I find any additional
requirements to the package format to be a real pain. I have ~10
packages on CRAN and having to go through and add this extra
information all at once is a big hassle. R releases tend to happen
>> It may not be much work for you, but I find any additional
>> requirements to the package format to be a real pain. I have ~10
>> packages on CRAN and having to go through and add this extra
>> information all at once is a big hassle. R releases tend to happen in
>> the middle of the US academ
Dear Hadley,
thank you very much for your comments.
hadley wickham wrote:
- there are lots of packages without one, so this would create a lot of
work for people to add them.
No, I don't think that this is too much work. Positively speaking, it's one
small contribution to bring more light into
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 06/10/2008 8:06 AM, Thomas Petzoldt wrote:
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
Thomas Petzoldt wrote:
Dear R developers,
if one uses package.skeleton() to create a new package, then a file
anRpackage.Rd with the following entries is prepared:
\name{anRpackage-package}
\alias{anR
> You are right, .Rd has its limitations, but as you say, there is nothing
> better available in the moment. (BTW: I heard rumours at useR! about
> discussions on a meta documentation format? Is there any public information
> about this??)
What do you mean by meta documentation format? Do you mea
>> - there are lots of packages without one, so this would create a lot of
>> work for people to add them.
>
> No, I don't think that this is too much work. Positively speaking, it's one
> small contribution to bring more light into the exponentially growing
> haystack.
It may not be much work for
On 06/10/2008 8:06 AM, Thomas Petzoldt wrote:
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
Thomas Petzoldt wrote:
Dear R developers,
if one uses package.skeleton() to create a new package, then a file
anRpackage.Rd with the following entries is prepared:
\name{anRpackage-package}
\alias{anRpackage-package}
\alias
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
Thomas Petzoldt wrote:
Dear R developers,
if one uses package.skeleton() to create a new package, then a file
anRpackage.Rd with the following entries is prepared:
\name{anRpackage-package}
\alias{anRpackage-package}
\alias{anRpackage}
\docType{package}
Packages creat
Thomas Petzoldt wrote:
Dear R developers,
if one uses package.skeleton() to create a new package, then a file
anRpackage.Rd with the following entries is prepared:
\name{anRpackage-package}
\alias{anRpackage-package}
\alias{anRpackage}
\docType{package}
Packages created this way have a defi
Dear R developers,
if one uses package.skeleton() to create a new package, then a file
anRpackage.Rd with the following entries is prepared:
\name{anRpackage-package}
\alias{anRpackage-package}
\alias{anRpackage}
\docType{package}
Packages created this way have a definite entry or overview p
17 matches
Mail list logo
