Note that this is identical to Problem #8363, marked as 'not-
reproducible'.
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 17:41:32 +0100
From: Philip Lijnzaad
Subject: R CMD INSTALL fails if cd prints stuff to stdout ...
To: r-b...@r-project.org
A possible patch would be
Index: src/scripts/INSTALL.in
This problem could be caused by having CDPATH set. E.g.,
% env CDPATH=. ~/R-svn/r-devel/R/bin/R CMD INSTALL -l Rlib
testCMacros
/homes/bill/packages/Rlib
/homes/bill/R-svn/r-devel/R/bin/INSTALL: line 948: cd:
/homes/bill/packages/testCMacros
/a/seafiler01.na.tibco.com/vol/vol2/users/b
Hi,
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> I've started to implement checks for package versions on dependencies in
> install.packages(). However, this is revealing a number of
> problems/misconceptions.
>
>
> (A) We do not check versions when loading namespaces, ahd the namespace
> registry does not conta
Hi,
I have now spent some time looking at whether this is possible with one
repository. The _easy_ part is getting the selection list to display
more information. Right now, the code that determines what is displayed
is inside a function called "explode_bundles" that is defined internally
to
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008, Martin Morgan wrote:
Prof Brian Ripley writes:
I've started to implement checks for package versions on dependencies
in install.packages(). However, this is revealing a number of
problems/misconceptions.
(A) We do not check versions when loading namespaces, ahd the
nam
Prof Brian Ripley writes:
> I've started to implement checks for package versions on dependencies
> in install.packages(). However, this is revealing a number of
> problems/misconceptions.
>
>
> (A) We do not check versions when loading namespaces, ahd the
> namespace registry does not contain v
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Prof Brian Ripley
wrote:
> (D) We can really only handle >= dependencies on package versions (but then
> I can see no other ops in use). install.packages() will find the latest
Ryacas works with XML 1.96-0; however, after Ryacas was released newer
versions of XM
I've started to implement checks for package versions on dependencies in
install.packages(). However, this is revealing a number of
problems/misconceptions.
(A) We do not check versions when loading namespaces, ahd the namespace
registry does not contain version information. So that for exa
Hi Jim --
"James MacDonald" writes:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone point me to the relevant documentation that covers
> what should be in the DESCRIPTION file for packages that have
> functions imported via the NAMESPACE file? I have read the R
> Extensions manual, but I cannot find where it covers the
Perhaps it would be sufficient as a first step to just display the version
that will be downloaded. That would still only let you pick one but at
least you would know which one.
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 12/15/2008 10:58 AM, Kevin R. Coombes wrote:
>>
>> I knew
On 12/15/2008 10:58 AM, Kevin R. Coombes wrote:
I knew that (but forgot to include it in my statement of the question).
Thanks for pointing it out.
Is there any way to convince the selection box (or its developers) to
include the version information that is already available?
The selection
Hi, I believe I've encountered a bug in the do_install function in the
script used by R CMD INSTALL. I'm using R 2.8.0 under OS X 10.5.5. I was
trying to install a package from source (the package gaga which I maintain,
which I checked and builds correctly for R 2.8.0) when I get the error
message
--=_Part_26951_7337931.1229163663746
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Dear R maintainer!
> User misread: it reduces the *base* cex.
It's not quite clear what the base cex is. Having read help(par), I
got the impression that i
I knew that (but forgot to include it in my statement of the question).
Thanks for pointing it out.
Is there any way to convince the selection box (or its developers) to
include the version information that is already available?
Kevin
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 12/15/2008 10:31 AM,
On 12/15/2008 10:31 AM, Kevin R. Coombes wrote:
Hi,
Terry Therneau's question about package development reminded me of a
different issue. I maintain several packages along with a repository for
them at "http://bioinformatics.mdanderson.org/OOMPA/";. Several people
are working on adding featur
Hi,
Terry Therneau's question about package development reminded me of a
different issue. I maintain several packages along with a repository for
them at "http://bioinformatics.mdanderson.org/OOMPA/";. Several people
are working on adding features or testing the packages. So, I often want
to
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>
> See the help page. We haven't been told but it looks like the Debian
> system is in a UTF-8 locale: reencode=FALSE is likely appropriate there.
> However, the posting guide does ask for the output of sessionInof() for a
> good reason.
>
Thank you very much; the
17 matches
Mail list logo
